CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 13

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A Review of the Ecosystem Services Provided by the Native Oyster (Ostrea edulis): Implications for Restoration

Thomas, S, Collins, K, Hauton, C, Jensen, A·2022·IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
DOI 10.1088/1757-899x/1245/1/012010
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Native oyster (Ostrea edulis) habitat has been decimated across the majority of its natural range as a result of human activity. In recent decades, oyster restoration projects have gathered increasing support due to their potential to provide ecosystem services that offset increasing pressure from human development, resource demand, and also climate change. These ecosystem services are reviewed here, so as to inform the potential benefit of restoration projects. Ecosystem services can be divided into four categories: provisioning services through direct utilisation of oysters and the species they support, regulating services that help maintain a healthy environment, habitat services that benefit biodiversity, and cultural services that can influence tourism and wider cultural values. Ecosystem services are often interlinked in complex networks, though these can be linked back to two overarching ecosystem functions, stemming from either the filter feeding activity of oysters, or the physical reef structure that they provide. The MARINEFF oyster enhancement reefs installed in the Solent, September 2020, are intended to support the extensive Solent Oyster Restoration Project initiated by the Blue Marine Foundation. The expectation is that they will facilitate both oyster settlement and the release of larvae for the repopulation of the Solent system. This may contribute to the recovery of ecosystem services mentioned in this review. It is important to note however that there is a lack of baseline data for native oysters, and the ecosystem service values they provide are poorly constrained, meaning that ecosystem service estimates are derived largely from other species of oyster. This inhibits our ability to accurately calculate and model natural capital provided by native oysters, highlighting the necessity for further research so as to inform management and restoration targets.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1757-899x/1245/1/012010

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Figure 1 The network of ecosystem functions that underpin native oyster ecosystem services as identified within the TEEB typology [13]. A three-step process is used to indicate how an ecosystem produces a complex network of ecosystem functions, that can individually or collectively lead to ecosystem services valued by humans.
Figure 1 The network of ecosystem functions that underpin native oyster ecosystem services as identified within the TEEB typology [13]. A three-step process is used to indicate how an ecosystem produces a complex network of ecosystem functions, that can individually or collectively lead to ecosystem services valued by humans.CC-BY · From the PDF
Figure 2 Composite bar chart indicating the comparative cost of oyster restoration (red) along with the NC benefits (green) associated with restoration of a 100-mile-long reef over a ten-year period, from Cheong et al [38].
Figure 2 Composite bar chart indicating the comparative cost of oyster restoration (red) along with the NC benefits (green) associated with restoration of a 100-mile-long reef over a ten-year period, from Cheong et al [38].CC-BY · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 49

  1. Rullens, 2019, Ecological mechanisms underpinning ecosystem service bundles in marine environments - A case study for shellfish, Front Mar Sci, 6, 1, 10.3389/fmars.2019.00409 · DOI
  2. Hooper, 2019, Applying the natural capital approach to decision making for the marine environment, Ecosyst Serv, 38, 1, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2019.100947 · DOI
  3. Costanza, 1997, The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital, Nat, 387, 253, 10.1038/387253a0 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Culhane, 2018, Linking marine ecosystems with the services they supply: what are the relevant service providing units?, Ecol Appl, 28, 1740, 10.1002/eap.1779 · DOI
  5. Fariñas-Franco, 2018, Missing native oyster (Ostrea edulis L.) beds in a European Marine Protected Area: Should there be widespread restorative management?, Biol Conserv, 221, 293, 10.1016/j.biocon.2018.03.010 · DOI
  6. Grabowski, 2012, Economic valuation of ecosystem services provided by oyster reefs, BioScience, 62, 900, 10.1525/bio.2012.62.10.10 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Watson, 2020, Assessing the natural capital value of water quality and climate regulation in temperate marine systems using a EUNIS biotope classification approach, Sci Total Environ, 744, 1, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140688 · DOI
  8. Peterson, 2003, Estimated enhancement of fish production resulting from restoring oyster reef habitat: Quantitative valuation, Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 264, 249, 10.3354/meps264249 · DOI
  9. Gregalis, 2009, Restored Oyster Reef Location and Design Affect Responses of Resident and Transient Fish, Crab, and Shellfish Species in Mobile Bay, Alabama, Trans Am Fish Soc, 138, 314, 10.1577/T08-041.1 · DOI
  10. Bonnard, 2019, Key Insights, Tools, and Future Prospects on Oyster Shell End-of-Life: A Critical Analysis of Sustainable Solutions, Environ Sci Technol, 54, 26, 10.1021/acs.est.9b03736 · DOI
  11. Silva, 2019, The potential use of oyster shell waste in new value-added by-product, Resources, 8, 1, 10.3390/resources8010013 · DOI
  12. Yang, 2010, Effect of partial replacement of sand with dry oyster shell on the long-term performance of concrete, Constr Build Mater, 24, 758, 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.10.032 · DOI
  13. Hong, 2021, Agricultural by-products and oyster shell as alternative nutrient sources for microbial sealing of early age cracks in mortar, AMB Expr, 11, 1, 10.1186/s13568-020-01166-5 · DOI
  14. Kwon, 2009, Development of vermicast from sludge and powdered oyster shell, J Clean Prod, 17, 708, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.11.014 · DOI
  15. Lee, 2008, Effects of oyster shell on soil chemical and biological properties and cabbage productivity as a liming materials, Waste Manag, 28, 2702, 10.1016/j.wasman.2007.12.005 · DOI
  16. Van der Schatte Olivier, 2020, A global review of the ecosystem services provided by bivalve aquaculture, Rev Aquac, 12, 3, 10.1111/raq.12301 · DOI
  17. Nakatani, 2009, Transesterification of soybean oil using combusted oyster shell waste as a catalyst, Bioresour Technol, 100, 1510, 10.1016/j.biortech.2008.09.007 · DOI
  18. Choi, 2019, Catalytic pyrolysis of brown algae using carbon dioxide and oyster shell, J CO2 Util, 34, 668, 10.1016/j.jcou.2019.08.023 · DOI
  19. Coringa, 2018, Bone substitute made from a Brazilian oyster shell functions as a fast stimulator for bone-forming cells in an animal model, PLoS ONE, 13, 1, 10.1371/journal.pone.0198697 · DOI
  20. Lee, 2017, Highly bioavailable nanocalcium from oyster shell for preventing osteoporosis in rats, Int J Food Sci Nutr, 68, 931, 10.1080/09637486.2017.1307948 · DOI
  21. Ahmed, 2015, Evaluation of food products fortified with oyster shell for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, J Food Sci Technol, 52, 6816, 10.1007/s13197-015-1725-3 · DOI
  22. Palaniappan, 2014, Oyster shell calcium induced parotid swelling, J Pharmacol Pharmacother, 5, 256, 10.4103/0976-500X.142446 · DOI
  23. Lee, 2020, Missing the full story: First estimates of carbon deposition rates for the European flat oyster, Ostrea edulis, Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst, 30, 2076, 10.1002/aqc.3402 · DOI
  24. Fodrie, 2017, Oyster reefs as carbon sources and sinks, Proc R Soc B Biol Sci, 284
  25. Coen, 2007, Ecosystem services related to oyster restoration, Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 341, 303, 10.3354/meps341303 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Gracia, 2018, Use of ecosystems in coastal erosion management, Ocean Coast Manag, 156, 277, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2017.07.009 · DOI
  27. Scyphers, 2011, Oyster reefs as natural breakwaters mitigate shoreline loss and facilitate fisheries, PLoS One, 6, e22396, 10.1371/journal.pone.0022396 · DOI
  28. Cheong, 2013, Coastal adaptation with ecological engineering, Nat Clim Chang, 3, 787, 10.1038/nclimate1854 · DOI
  29. Newell, 2005, Influence of Eastern Oysters on Nitrogen and Phosphorus Regeneration in Chesapeake Bay, USA, Comp Roles Suspens Ecosyst, 47, 93, 10.1007/1-4020-3030-4_6 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Cerco, 2015, A Multi-module Approach to Calculation of Oyster (Crassostrea virginica) Environmental Benefits, Environ Manage, 56, 467, 10.1007/s00267-015-0511-3 · DOI
  31. Higgins, 2011, Nutrient Bioassimilation Capacity of Aquacultured Oysters: Quantification of an Ecosystem Service, J Environ Qual, 40, 271, 10.2134/jeq2010.0203 · DOI
  32. Troost, 2010, Causes and effects of a highly successful marine invasion: Case-study of the introduced Pacific oyster Crassostrea gigas in continental NW European estuaries, J Sea Res, 64, 145, 10.1016/j.seares.2010.02.004 · DOI
  33. Walles, 2015, The Ecosystem Engineer Crassostrea gigas Affects Tidal Flat Morphology Beyond the Boundary of Their Reef Structures, Estuaries and Coasts, 38, 941, 10.1007/s12237-014-9860-z · DOI
  34. Lenihan, 1999, The influence of multiple environmental stressors on susceptibility to parasites: An experimental determination with oysters, Limnol Oceanogr, 44, 910, 10.4319/lo.1999.44.3_part_2.0910 · DOI
  35. Farber, 2002, Economic and ecological concepts for valuing ecosystem services, Ecol Econ, 41, 375, 10.1016/S0921-8009(02)00088-5 · DOI
  36. Newell, 2004, Modeling Seagrass Density and Distribution in Response to Changes in Turbidity Stemming from Bivalve Filtration and Seagrass Sediment Stabilization, Estuaries and Coasts, 27, 793, 10.1007/BF02912041 · DOI
  37. Donadi, 2013, Cross-habitat interactions among bivalve species control community structure on intertidal flats, Ecology, 94, 489, 10.1890/12-0048.1 · DOI
  38. Peterson, 1999, The potential for suspension feeding bivalves to increase seagrass productivity, J Exp Mar Bio Ecol, 240, 37, 10.1016/S0022-0981(99)00040-4 · DOI
  39. Wall, 2008, Facilitation of seagrass Zostera marina productivity by suspension-feeding bivalves, Mar Ecol Prog Ser, 357, 165, 10.3354/meps07289 · DOI
  40. Pogoda, 2019, The Native Oyster Restoration Alliance (NORA) and the Berlin Oyster Recommendation: Bringing back a key ecosystem engineer by developing and supporting best practice in Europe, Aquat Living Resour, 32, 10.1051/alr/2019012 · DOI
  41. Pontee, 2016, Nature-based solutions: Lessons from around the world, Marit Eng, 169, 29, 10.1680/jmaen.15.00027 · DOI
  42. Potts, 2014, Do marine protected areas deliver flows of ecosystem services to support human welfare?, Mar Policy, 44, 139, 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.08.011 · DOI
  43. Stine, 2019, Musical Aesthetics of the Natural World: Two Modern Compositional Approaches, Jefferson J Sci Cult, 5, 21
  44. zu Ermgassen, 2012, Historical ecology with real numbers: Past and present extent and biomass of an imperilled estuarine habitat, Proc R Soc B Biol Sci, 279, 3393, 10.1098/rspb.2012.0313 · DOI
  45. Lallias, 2010, Strategies for the retention of high genetic variability in European flat oyster (Ostrea edulis) restoration programmes, Conserv Genet, 11, 1899, 10.1007/s10592-010-0081-0 · DOI
  46. Culloty, 2007, Bonamia Ostreae in the Native Oyster Ostrea Edulis, Mar Environ Heal Ser, 29, 1
  47. Hudson, 1991, Impact and spread of bonamiasis in the UK, Aquaculture, 93, 279, 10.1016/0044-8486(91)90240-8 · DOI
  48. Carral, 2020, Assessment of the materials employed in green artificial reefs for the galician estuaries in terms of circular economy, Int J Environ Res Public Health, 17, 1, 10.3390/ijerph17238850 · DOI
  49. Sas, 2020, Bonamia infection in native oysters (Ostrea edulis) in relation to European restoration projects, Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst, 30, 2150, 10.1002/aqc.3430 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Thomas, S., Collins, K., Hauton, C., & Jensen, A.
Venue
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Publisher
IOP Publishing
Published
2022-07-01
Volume
1245
Issue
1
Pages
012010
ISSN
  • 1757-8981
  • 1757-899X
DOI
10.1088/1757-899x/1245/1/012010
Cited by
13
References
0
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review