The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Emissivity of black plated open honeycomb and black coatings at cryogenic temperatures
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ando et al. found that the emissivity of flat surfaces decreased markedly with decreasing temperature.
“Experimental results showed that the emissivity of flat surfaces decreased markedly with decreasing temperature, whereas the emissivity of honeycomb-structured surfaces exhibited minimal temperature dependence.”
From Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [51]
Ando et al. found that the emissivity of honeycomb-structured surfaces exhibited minimal temperature dependence.
“Experimental results showed that the emissivity of flat surfaces decreased markedly with decreasing temperature, whereas the emissivity of honeycomb-structured surfaces exhibited minimal temperature dependence.”
From Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [51]
The field has seen a gradual shift from liquid-cryogen baths to refrigeration-based cooling systems for cryogenic emissivity measurements.
“With respect to cooling techniques, the field has seen a gradual shift from liquid-cryogen baths [13,33,36,42,45,46,53] to refrigeration-based cooling systems [16,43,47,51,52].”
From Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [51]
Ando et al. found that after applying a black coating, surfaces maintained high emissivity even at cryogenic temperatures.
“Moreover, after applying a black coating, these surfaces maintained high emissivity even at cryogenic temperatures.”
From Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review (2026) · cites this paper as [51]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Jamotton P, 2000, Proc. 30th Int. Conf. on Environmental Systems (Toulouse)
- Jamotton P, 2004, Proc 5th Int. Symp. on Environmental Testing for Space Programmes (Noordwijk)
- Valentini D, 2007, 3rd European Space Cryogenic Workshop
- Ade P A R, 2012, Astronomy and Astrophysics manuscript
- Tuttle J, 2015, Proc. Int. Cryogenic Materials Conf.
- Ogawa H, 2016, Proc. 46th International Conference on Environmental Systems (Vienna)
- 10.1073/pnas.0900155106 · DOI
- 10.1063/1.1397759 · DOI
- 10.1115/1.3684295 · DOI
- 10.1016/0017-9310(65)90023-2 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Thermal Radiation Testing Methods at Cryogenic Temperatures: A Review
Li, B., & Shen, F. (2026) · Cryo · doi:10.3390/cryo2010004 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Ando, M., Tanaka, K., Shinozaki, K., Nishikawa, I., & Sugita, H.
- Venue
- IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2019-04-15
- Volume
- 502
- Pages
- 012071
- ISSN
- 1757-899X
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
