Cited by 18Building Energy and Comfort OptimizationBuilding energy efficiency and sustainabilityProbabilistic and Robust Engineering Design

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Robust and resilient buildings: A framework for defining the protection against climate uncertainty

Open access
Moazami, Amin, Carlucci, Salvatore, Geving, Stig·2019·IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering

Abstract

The design of high-performance buildings has been questioned for their actual performance in operation, where the impact of external perturbations such as occupant behavior and climate has proved to be prominent. These sources of variability, called aleatory uncertainties, are inherent variations of nondeterministic systems and are irreducible. Therefore, one of the main approaches to deal with these uncertainties is to consider them as noise during the design phase. The goal of the design is hence achieving a solution whose performance is least sensitive to the noise. This specific design process is called robust design. In this study, a prospect of climate conditions that a building might face during its lifespan is identified. However, although robust design can support the design of building variants whose performance is insensitive to typical climate conditions and also predictable extreme climate conditions, these building variants cannot be considered protected in case of unforeseeable extreme events. During such events, another property called resilience is required, which focuses on withstanding and recovering during and after the occurrence of the event. This study reviews the concepts of robustness and resilience and organizes them into a framework that clarifies their relationships in the protection of buildings against climate uncertainties.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1757-899x/609/7/072068

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 18

Metadata

Authors
Moazami, A., Carlucci, S., & Geving, S.
Affiliations
Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
Corresponding author
Moazami, Amin
Venue
IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering
Published
2019-09-01
Volume
609
Issue
7
Pages
072068
ISSN
  • 1757-8981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1757-899X
OpenAlex
W2982081662
Cited by
18
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.69
Type
conference paper
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • IOP Conference Series Materials Science and Engineering (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • IrInSubria (University of Insubria) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building Energy and Comfort Optimization
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Building energy efficiency and sustainability
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Probabilistic and Robust Engineering Design
Keywords
robust design, building resilience, climate uncertainty, aleatoric uncertainty, climate extremes, building performance, occupant behavior, high-performance buildings, design framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review