Cited by 2503D Printing in Biomedical ResearchHydrogels: synthesis, properties, applicationsTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine

3D bioprinting of BM-MSCs-loaded ECM biomimetic hydrogels for in vitro neocartilage formation

Open access
Costantini, Marco, Idaszek, Joanna, Szöke, Krisztina, Jaroszewicz, Jakub, Dentini, Mariella, Barbetta, Andrea, Brinchmann, Jan E, Święszkowski, Wojciech·2016·Biofabrication

Abstract

In this work we demonstrate how to print 3D biomimetic hydrogel scaffolds for cartilage tissue engineering with high cell density (>10 7 cells ml −1 ), high cell viability (85 ÷ 90%) and high printing resolution (≈100 μ m) through a two coaxial-needles system. The scaffolds were composed of modified biopolymers present in the extracellular matrix (ECM) of cartilage, namely gelatin methacrylamide (GelMA), chondroitin sulfate amino ethyl methacrylate (CS-AEMA) and hyaluronic acid methacrylate (HAMA). The polymers were used to prepare three photocurable bioinks with increasing degree of biomimicry: (i) GelMA, (ii) GelMA + CS-AEMA and (iii) GelMA + CS-AEMA + HAMA. Alginate was added to the bioinks as templating agent to form stable fibers during 3D printing. In all cases, bioink solutions were loaded with bone marrow-derived human mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs). After printing, the samples were cultured in expansion (negative control) and chondrogenic media to evaluate the possible differentiating effect exerted by the biomimetic matrix or the synergistic effect of the matrix and chondrogenic supplements. After 7, 14, and 21 days, gene expression of the chondrogenic markers (COL2A1 and aggrecan), marker of osteogenesis (COL1A1) and marker of hypertrophy (COL10A1) were evaluated qualitatively by means of fluorescence immunocytochemistry and quantitatively by means of RT-qPCR. The observed enhanced viability and chondrogenic differentiation of BM-MSCs, as well as high robustness and accuracy of the employed deposition method, make the presented approach a valid candidate for advanced engineering of cartilage tissue.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/1758-5090/8/3/035002

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Various biofunctional materials and cell types can be printed simultaneously onto a substrate of cell-compatible biomaterials to build 3D complex constructs with good spatial resolution and reproducibility.

    “Various biofunctional materials and cell types can thus be printed simultaneously onto a substrate of cell-compatible biomaterials to build 3D complex constructs with good spatial resolution and reproducibility (Fig. 3a)130,148–151.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 45 · Cited by 250

Authors
Costantini, M., Idaszek, J., Szöke, K., Jaroszewicz, J., Dentini, M., Barbetta, A., Brinchmann, J. E., & Święszkowski, W.
Affiliations
  • Warsaw University of Technology (PL)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Venue
Biofabrication
Published
2016-07-18
Volume
8
Issue
3
Pages
035002
ISSN
  • 1758-5082 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-5090
OpenAlex
W2478743684
Cited by
250
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 35 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 31 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Biofabrication (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IRIS Research product catalog (Sapienza University of Rome) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Ateneo Found - La Sapienza
  • NewJoint (Nor/202132/68/2013)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › 3D Printing in Biomedical Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Hydrogels: synthesis, properties, applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Keywords
3D bioprinting, cartilage tissue engineering, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, biomimetic hydrogels, gelatin methacryloyl, hyaluronic acid methacrylate, chondrogenic differentiation, neocartilage formation, COL2A1, aggrecan, COL10A1
MeSH terms
Bone Marrow Cells, Collagen, Extracellular Matrix, Humans, Hydrogels, Biomimetic Materials, Aggrecans, Mesenchymal Stem Cells, Printing, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review