Cited by 368Orbital Angular Momentum in OpticsQuantum and Classical ElectrodynamicsLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications

Internal flows and energy circulation in light beams

Open access
Bekshaev, Aleksandr, Bliokh, Konstantin Y, Soskin, Marat·2011·Journal of Optics

Abstract

We review optical phenomena associated with the internal energy redistribution which accompany propagation and transformations of monochromatic light fields in homogeneous media.The total energy flow (linear-momentum density, Poynting vector) can be divided into a spin part associated with the polarization and an orbital part associated with the spatial inhomogeneity.We give a general description of the internal flows in the coordinate and momentum (angular spectrum) representations for both nonparaxial and paraxial fields.This enables one to determine local densities and integral values of the spin and orbital angular momenta of the field.We analyse patterns of the internal flows in standard beam models (Gaussian, Laguerre-Gaussian, flat-top beam, etc), which provide an insightful picture of the energy transport.Emphasis is given to the singular points of the flow fields.We describe the spin-orbit and orbit-orbit interactions in the processes of beam focusing and symmetry breakdown.Finally, we consider how the energy flows manifest themselves in the mechanical action on probing particles and in the transformations of a propagating beam subjected to a transverse perturbation.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2040-8978/13/5/053001

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Retaining divergence terms allows the momentum density to be expressed in a variety of suggestive forms, but it is difficult to assign these any particular physical significance because of non-uniqueness.

    “We note, however, that retaining such divergence terms allows us to express the momentum density in a variety of suggestive forms [80], although, because of the non-uniqueness described above, it is dif fi cult to assign to these any particular physical signi fi cance.”

    From Optical Dirac equation (2014) · cites this paper as [80]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 190 · Cited by 368

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Ignatowskii V S 1919 Trans. Opt. Inst, Petrograd 1 paper IV
  2. Mokhun I, Mokhun A and Viktorovskaya Ju 2006 Singularities of Poyning vector and the structure of optical fields Ukr. J. Phys. Opt. 7 129-41 · DOI
  3. Mokhun I, Brandel R and Viktorovskaya Yu 2006 Angular momentum of electromagnetic field in areas of polarization singularities Ukr. J. Phys. Opt. 7 63-73 · DOI
  4. Felde Ch V 2004 Diffraction diagnostics of phase singularities in optical fields Proc. SPIE 5477 67-76

Authors
Bekshaev, A., Bliokh, K. Y., & Soskin, M.
Affiliations
  • Odesa I. I. Mechnikov National University (UA)
  • Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway (IE)
  • National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (UA)
Venue
Journal of Optics
Published
2011-03-24
Volume
13
Issue
5
Pages
053001
ISSN
  • 0150-536X (ISSN-L)
  • 2040-8978
  • 2040-8986
OpenAlex
W2060368581
Cited by
368
References
190
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 26 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 23 · 2014: 18 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 25
FWCI
11.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Optics (publishedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • ARAN (University of Galway Research Repository) (Ollscoil na Gaillimhe – University of Galway) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Research Repository UCD (University College Dublin) (cc-by-nc)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Science Foundation Ireland (07/IN.1/I906)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Orbital Angular Momentum in Optics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Laser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Keywords
spin angular momentum, orbital angular momentum, Poynting vector, angular spectrum, nonparaxial beams, paraxial beams, Laguerre-Gaussian beams, flat-top beam, singular points, spin-orbit coupling, orbit-orbit interaction, beam focusing, transverse perturbations, optical manipulation of particles, energy transport

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review