Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

THE HIGH ALBEDO OF THE HOT JUPITER KEPLER-7 b

Open access
Demory, Brice-Olivier, Seager, Sara, Madhusudhan, Nikku, Kjeldsen, Hans, Christensen-Dalsgaard, Jørgen, Gillon, Michaël, Rowe, Jason F., Welsh, William F., Adams, Elisabeth R., Dupree, Andrea, McCarthy, Don, Kulesa, Craig, Borucki, William J., Koch, David G.·2011·The Astrophysical Journal

Abstract

Hot Jupiters are expected to be dark from both observations (albedo upper limits) and theory (alkali metals and/or TiO and VO absorption). However, only a handful of hot Jupiters have been observed with high enough photometric precision at visible wavelengths to investigate these expectations. The NASA Kepler mission provides a means to widen the sample and to assess the extent to which hot Jupiter albedos are low. We present a global analysis of Kepler-7 b based on Q0–Q4 data, published radial velocities, and asteroseismology constraints. We measure an occultation depth in the Kepler bandpass of 44 ± 5 ppm. If directly related to the albedo, this translates to a Kepler geometric albedo of 0.32 ± 0.03, the most precise value measured so far for an exoplanet. We also characterize the planetary orbital phase light curve with an amplitude of 42 ± 4 ppm. Using atmospheric models, we find it unlikely that the high albedo is due to a dominant thermal component and propose two solutions to explain the observed planetary flux. First, we interpret the Kepler-7 b albedo as resulting from an excess reflection over what can be explained solely by Rayleigh scattering, along with a nominal thermal component. This excess reflection might indicate the presence of a cloud or haze layer in the atmosphere, motivating new modeling and observational efforts. Alternatively, the albedo can be explained by Rayleigh scattering alone if Na and K are depleted in the atmosphere by a factor of 10–100 below solar abundances.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2041-8205/735/1/l12

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Metadata

Authors
Demory, B.-O., Seager, S., Madhusudhan, N., Kjeldsen, H., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Gillon, M., Rowe, J. F., Welsh, W. F., Adams, E. R., Dupree, A., McCarthy, D., Kulesa, C., Borucki, W. J., & Koch, D. G.
Venue
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2011-06-06
Volume
735
Issue
1
Pages
L12
ISSN
  • 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
  • 2041-8213
OpenAlex
W2029727466
Cited by
159
References
1
FWCI
8.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: THE HIGH ALBEDO OF THE HOT JUPITER KEPLER-7 b. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/2041-8205/735/1/l12
The paper
Demory, B.-O., Seager, S., Madhusudhan, N., Kjeldsen, H., Christensen-Dalsgaard, J., Gillon, M., Rowe, J. F., Welsh, W. F., Adams, E. R., Dupree, A., McCarthy, D., Kulesa, C., Borucki, W. J., & Koch, D. G. (2011). THE HIGH ALBEDO OF THE HOT JUPITER KEPLER-7 b. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/735/1/l12

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.