The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
OBSERVATIONAL UPPER BOUND ON THE COSMIC ABUNDANCES OF NEGATIVE-MASS COMPACT OBJECTS AND ELLIS WORMHOLES FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY QUASAR LENS SEARCH
Open accessAbstract
The latest result in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Lens Search (SQLS) has set the first cosmological constraints on negative-mass compact objects and Ellis wormholes. There are no multiple images lensed by the above two exotic objects for ∼50, 000 distant quasars in the SQLS data. Therefore, an upper bound is put on the cosmic abundances of these lenses. The number density of negative-mass compact objects is n < 10 −8 (10 −4 ) h 3 Mpc −3 at the mass scale | M | > 10 15 (10 12 ) M ☉ , which corresponds to the cosmological density parameter |Ω| < 10 −4 at the galaxy and cluster mass range | M | = 10 12–15 M ☉ . The number density of the Ellis wormhole is n < 10 −4 h 3 Mpc −3 for a range of the throat radius a = 10–10 4 pc, which is much smaller than the Einstein ring radius.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“A negative ADM mass is observationally disfavoured, astronomers have looked for such objects and not seen them [45], and is also theoretically disfavoured [46,47]-causing problems for both chronology protection and gravitational lensing; one would expect unusual caustics which do not seem to correspond to anything astronomers have ever seen [48,49].”
From ADM mass in warp drive spacetimes (2023) · cites this paper as [45]
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey: Technical Summary
York, D., Adelman, J., Anderson, J., Anderson, S., Annis, J., Bahcall, N., Bakken, J., Barkhouser, R., Bastian, S., Berman, E., et al. (2000) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/301513 · Cited by 8,368
Ether flow through a drainhole: A particle model in general relativity
Ellis, H. G. (1973) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1666161 · Cited by 952
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Survey: Quasar Luminosity Function from Data Release 3
Richards, G. T., Strauss, M. A., Fan, X., Hall, P. B., Jester, S., Schneider, D. P., Berk, D. E. V., Stoughton, C., Anderson, S. F., Brunner, R. J., et al. (2006) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/503559 · Cited by 875
Fukugita, M., & Peebles, P. J. E. (2004) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/425155 · Cited by 550
Schneider, P., Ehlers, J., & Falco, E. E. (1992) · Astronomy and astrophysics library · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-2756-4 · Cited by 475
An Imprint of Superstructures on the Microwave Background due to the Integrated Sachs-Wolfe Effect
Granett, B. R., Neyrinck, M. C., & Szapudi, I. (2008) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1086/591670 · Cited by 295
The 2dF���SDSS LRG and QSO survey: the QSO luminosity function at 0.4 <z< 2.6
Croom, S. M., Richards, G. T., Shanks, T., Boyle, B. J., Strauss, M. A., Myers, A. D., Nichol, R. C., Pimbblet, K. A., Ross, N. P., Schneider, D. P., et al. (2009) · Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15398.x · Cited by 254
GRAVITATIONAL MICROLENSING BY THE ELLIS WORMHOLE
Abe, F. (2010) · The Astrophysical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-637x/725/1/787 · Cited by 185
The Sloan Digital Sky Survey Quasar Lens Search. I. Candidate Selection Algorithm
Oguri, M., Inada, N., Pindor, B., Strauss, M. A., Richards, G. T., Hennawi, J. F., Turner, E. L., Lupton, R. H., Schneider, D. P., Fukugita, M., et al. (2006) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1086/506019 · Cited by 161
THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY QUASAR LENS SEARCH. V. FINAL CATALOG FROM THE SEVENTH DATA RELEASE
Inada, N., Oguri, M., Shin, M.-S., Kayo, I., Strauss, M. A., Morokuma, T., Rusu, C. E., Fukugita, M., Kochanek, C. S., Richards, G. T., et al. (2012) · The Astronomical Journal · doi:10.1088/0004-6256/143/5/119 · Cited by 154
Research works printed but not linked: 21
- Barnacka, 2012, PhRvD, 86, 043001
- Bondi, 1957, RvMP, 29, 423
- Cramer, 1995, PhRvD, 51, 3117
- Hinshaw, 2012, ApJS
- Ilić, 2013, A&A
- Jammer, 1961, Concepts of Mass in Classical and Modern Physics
- Jammer, 1999, Concepts of Mass in Contemporary Physics and Philosophy
- Kitamura, 2013, PhRvD, 87, 027501
- Krasnikov, 2000, PhRvD, 62, 084028
- Miyazaki, 2006, Proc. SPIE, 6269, 9
- Morris, 1988, AmJPh, 56, 395
- Morris, 1988, PhRvL, 61, 1446
- Nakajima, 2012, PhRvD, 85, 107501
- Nandi, 2006, PhRvD, 74, 024020
- Oguri, 2010, MNRAS, 405, 2579
- Perlick, 2004, PhRvD, 69, 064017
- Safonova, 2001, PhRvD, 65, 023001
- Schneider, 2006, Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro
- Torres, 1998, PhRvD, 58, 123001
- Tsukamoto, 2013, PhRvD, 87, 024024
- Visser, 1995, Lorentzuan Wormholes: From Einstein to Hawking
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gravitational lensing shear by an exotic lens object with negative convergence or negative mass
Izumi, K., Hagiwara, C., Nakajima, K., Kitamura, T., & Asada, H. (2013) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.88.024049 · Cited by 66
Self-citationADM mass in warp drive spacetimes
Schuster, S., Santiago, J., & Visser, M. (2023) · General Relativity and Gravitation · doi:10.1007/s10714-022-03061-9 · Cited by 8
“A negative ADM mass is observationally disfavoured, astronomers have looked for such objects and not seen them [44], and is also theoretically disfavoured [45, 46] — causing problems for both chronology protection and gravitational lensing; one would expect unusual caustics which do not seem to correspond to anything…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Takahashi, R., & Asada, H.
- Affiliations
- Hirosaki University (JP)
- Venue
- The Astrophysical Journal
- Publisher
- American Astronomical Society
- Published
- 2013-04-17
- Volume
- 768
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- L16
- ISSN
- 2041-8205 (ISSN-L)
- 2041-8213
- OpenAlex
- W2120485639
- Cited by
- 85
- References
- 24
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 2.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- The Astrophysical Journal Letters (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (25287062)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Cosmology and Gravitation Theories
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Keywords
- Ellis wormhole, quasar lensing, number density, exotic compact objects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: OBSERVATIONAL UPPER BOUND ON THE COSMIC ABUNDANCES OF NEGATIVE-MASS COMPACT OBJECTS AND ELLIS WORMHOLES FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY QUASAR LENS SEARCH. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/2041-8205/768/1/l16
- The paper
- Takahashi, R., & Asada, H. (2013). OBSERVATIONAL UPPER BOUND ON THE COSMIC ABUNDANCES OF NEGATIVE-MASS COMPACT OBJECTS AND ELLIS WORMHOLES FROM THE SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY QUASAR LENS SEARCH. The Astrophysical Journal. https://doi.org/10.1088/2041-8205/768/1/l16