Focus on quantum science and technology initiatives around the world
Open accessAbstract
for fermionic observables Kaiming Bian and Bujiao Wu - Quantum imaginary-time evolution with polynomial resources in evolution time
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
Cited by 27
- Authors
- Thew, R., Jennewein, T., & Sasaki, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Geneva (CH)
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- National Institute of Information and Communications Technology (JP)
- Venue
- Quantum Science and Technology
- Publisher
- IOP Publishing
- Published
- 2019-12-11
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 010201
- ISSN
- 2058-9565 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2996728673
- Cited by
- 27
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Quantum Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (publishedVersion)
- Archive ouverte UNIGE (University of Geneva) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Information and Cryptography
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Keywords
- quantum imaginary time evolution, quantum computing, quantum simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review