Cited by 388Machine Learning in Materials ScienceResearch Data Management PracticesScientific Computing and Data Management

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The NOMAD laboratory: from data sharing to artificial intelligence

Open access
Draxl, Claudia, Scheffler, Matthias·2019·Journal of Physics: Materials

Abstract

The Novel Materials Discovery (NOMAD) Laboratory is a user-driven platform for sharing and exploiting computational materials science data. It accounts for the various aspects of data being a crucial raw material and most relevant to accelerate materials research and engineering. NOMAD, with the NOMAD Repository, and its code-independent and normalized form, the NOMAD Archive, comprises the worldwide largest data collection of this field. Based on its findable accessible, interoperable, reusable data infrastructure, various services are offered, comprising advanced visualization, the NOMAD Encyclopedia, and artificial-intelligence tools. The latter are realized in the NOMAD Analytics Toolkit. Prerequisite for all this is the NOMAD metadata, a unique and thorough description of the data, that are produced by all important computer codes of the community. Uploaded data are tagged by a persistent identifier, and users can also request a digital object identifier to make data citable. Developments and advancements of parsers and metadata are organized jointly with users and code developers. In this work, we review the NOMAD concept and implementation, highlight its orthogonality to and synergistic interplay with other data collections, and provide an outlook regarding ongoing and future developments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2515-7639/ab13bb

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Computational approaches championed by the Materials Project, OQMD, AFLOWLIB and NOMAD have used density functional theory as approximations of physical energies.

    “Instead, computational approaches championed by the Materials Project (MP)16, the Open Quantum Materials Database (OQMD)17, AFLOWLIB20 and NOMAD21 have used first-principles calculations based on density functional theory (DFT) as approximations of physical energies.”

    From Scaling deep learning for materials discovery (2023) · cites this paper as [21]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Draxl, 2019, Big-data-driven materials science and its FAIR data infrastructure, 10.1007/978-3-319-42913-7_104-1 · DOI
  2. Tanaka, 2018, MRS Bull., 43, 662, 10.1557/mrs.2018.205 · DOI
  3. 2017, Nature, 546, 327
  4. Draxl, 2017, Nature, 548, 523, 10.1038/548523d · DOI
  5. Ghiringhelli, 2017, npj Comput. Mater., 3, 46, 10.1038/s41524-017-0048-5 · DOI
  6. Curtarolo, 2012, Comput. Mater. Sci., 58, 218, 10.1016/j.commatsci.2012.02.005 · DOI
  7. Calderon, 2015, Comput. Mater. Sci., 108, 233, 10.1016/j.commatsci.2015.07.019 · DOI
  8. Jain, 2018, The materials project: accelerating materials design through theory-driven data and tools, 10.1007/978-3-319-42913-7_60-1 · DOI
  9. Draxl, 2018, MRS Bull., 43, 676, 10.1557/mrs.2018.208 · DOI
  10. Saad, 2012, Phys. Rev. B, 85, 10.1103/PhysRevB.85.104104 · DOI
  11. Ghiringhelli, 2015, Phys. Rev. Lett., 114, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.105503 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Ghiringhelli, 2017, New J. Phys., 19, 10.1088/1367-2630/aa57bf · DOI
  13. Goldsmith, 2017, New J. Phys., 19, 10.1088/1367-2630/aa57c2 · DOI
  14. Glielmo, 2017, Phys. Rev. B, 95, 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.214302 · DOI
  15. Ouyang, 2018, Phys. Rev. Mater., 2
  16. Lambert, 2018, Comput. Phys. Commun., 232, 256, 10.1016/j.cpc.2018.04.029 · DOI
  17. Ziletti, 2018, Nat. Commun., 9, 2775, 10.1038/s41467-018-05169-6 · DOI
  18. Bartel, 2019, Sci Adv., 5, 10.1126/sciadv.aav0693 · DOI
  19. Sutton, 2019, npj Comput. Mater.
  20. Acosta, 2019, Nat. Mater.
  21. Broder, 1997, Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst., 29, 1157, 10.1016/S0169-7552(97)00031-7 · DOI
  22. Ke, 2017, Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst., 30, 3146
  23. Saal, 2013, JOM, 65, 1501, 10.1007/s11837-013-0755-4 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Draxl, C., & Scheffler, M.
Affiliations
Max Planck Society (DE)
Corresponding author
  • Draxl, Claudia
  • Scheffler, Matthias
Venue
Journal of Physics: Materials
Published
2019-05-13
Volume
2
Issue
3
Pages
036001
ISSN
2515-7639 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2924281192
Cited by
388
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 58 · 2024: 81 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 52 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 6
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Physics Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (cc-by)
Funders
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (676580)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Research Data Management Practices
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Scientific Computing and Data Management
Keywords
nomadic peoples, computational materials science, data sharing, data interoperability, metadata, persistent identifiers, AI tools, data visualization, data reuse

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review