Cited by 6Ethics and Social Impacts of AIFlooding and Environmental ImpactAcademic integrity and plagiarism

Considering the ethics of large machine learning models in the chemical sciences

Open access
Spotte-Smith, Evan Walter Clark·2025·Machine Learning: Science and Technology

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Foundation models, including large language models, vision-language models, and similar large-scale machine learning tools, are quickly becoming ubiquitous in society and in the professional world. Chemical practitioners are not immune to the appeal of foundation models, nor are they immune to the many risks and harms that these models introduce. In this work, I present the first analysis of foundation models using the combined lens of scientific ethics and chemical professional ethics. I find that general-purpose generative foundation models are in many ways incompatible with the moral practice of chemistry, though there are fewer ethical problems with chemistry-specific foundation models. My discussion concludes with an examination of how the harm associated with foundation models can be minimized and further poses a set of serious lingering questions for chemical practitioners and scientific ethicists.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2632-2153/adec3c

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 178 · Cited by 6

Authors
Spotte-Smith, E. W. C.
Venue
Machine Learning: Science and Technology
Published
2025-07-17
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
035007
ISSN
2632-2153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412024857
Cited by
6
References
178
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3
FWCI
6.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Machine Learning Science and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • ChemRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Carnegie Bosch Institute
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Flooding and Environmental Impact
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Academic integrity and plagiarism
Keywords
foundation models, large language models, scientific ethics, AI harms, AI risk mitigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review