Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 0Cellular Mechanics and InteractionsProtein Structure and DynamicsCell Image Analysis Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 71 of the 71 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Inferring spatially varying bending stiffness of biopolymers with deep-learning approach

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The bendability of biopolymers, including DNA, actin filaments, and microtubules, is crucial to diverse biological processes, such as cell motility and cytoskeletal organization. While conventional polymer models like the worm-like chain model assume uniform bending stiffness along the contour, biopolymers in reality often attain spatially varying bending stiffness as a result of complex cellular interactions. For instance, the bending stiffness of actin filaments and microtubules varies in response to associated binding proteins or chemical modifications. Despite its biological implications, measuring the position-dependent persistence length along polymer contours remains challenging. Here, we present a deep-learning (DL)-based method that quantitatively predicts spatially varying bending stiffness of biopolymers. Our framework segments a polymer chain into short overlapping fragments, predicts local persistence lengths using a DL model, and reconstructs full profiles. Using simulated data, we demonstrate that our approach achieves high accuracy and robustness even under data-scarce conditions. Applied to various biological systems, our method reveals a spatially varying stiffness from tip to base in filopodia as well as spatially heterogeneous stiffness in microtubules. Additionally, we investigate the internal mechanism of our DL model and show that the model utilizes multiple physics-related features for persistence length estimation while adaptively adjusting its attention based on polymer stiffness.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2632-2153/ae1a35

Cites

71 of 71 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 71 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Zhou, 2016, pp 2921, 10.1109/CVPR.2016.319) · DOI · Paper page
  2. Chattopadhay, 2018, vol 2018-January, pp 839, 10.1109/WACV.2018.00097) · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Hong, C., Lim, C., Oh, J., Lee, J.-B., Jeong, E. E., Yoo, J.-Y., Kim, W. K., & Jeon, J.-H.
Affiliations
  • Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Korea Institute for Advanced Study (KR)
Venue
Machine Learning: Science and Technology
Published
2025-11-13
Volume
6
Issue
4
Pages
045044
ISSN
2632-2153 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415753789
Cited by
0
References
71
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Machine Learning Science and Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Research Foundation of Korea (RS-2023-00218927)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Cellular Mechanics and Interactions
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
biopolymers, persistence length, F-actin, microtubules, DNA, worm-like chain model, filopodia, deep learning, attention mechanism, cytoskeleton

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Inferring spatially varying bending stiffness of biopolymers with deep-learning approach. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1088/2632-2153/ae1a35
The paper
Hong, C., Lim, C., Oh, J., Lee, J.-B., Jeong, E. E., Yoo, J.-Y., Kim, W. K., & Jeon, J.-H. (2025). Inferring spatially varying bending stiffness of biopolymers with deep-learning approach. Machine Learning: Science and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1088/2632-2153/ae1a35

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.