Cited by 2Atmospheric chemistry and aerosolsAtmospheric aerosols and cloudsClimate variability and models

Changing PM2.5 and related meteorology over India from 1950–2014: a new perspective from a chemistry-climate model ensemble

Open access
Hancock, Sarah, Fiore, Arlene M, Westervelt, Daniel M, Correa, Gus, Lamarque, Jean-François, Venkataraman, Chandra, Sharma, Arushi·2023·Environmental Research: Climate

Abstract

Surface PM2.5 concentrations in India have increased dramatically as emissions have risen in recent years. The role of meteorological factors in this increase is unclear, mainly due to a lack of long-term observations over the region. A 12-member ensemble of historical (1950–2014) simulations from the Community Earth System Model version 2-Whole Atmosphere Community Climate Model version 6 (CESM2-WACCM6) offers an unprecedented opportunity to examine simulated PM2.5 and meteorology for 20th century climates that can arise due to ‘climate noise’ under the same historical greenhouse gas and air pollutant emission trajectories. CESM2-WACCM6 includes interactive aerosol and gas-phase chemistry in the atmosphere coupled to ocean-sea ice-land models, and each ensemble member differs only in its initial conditions of the climate state. We systematically examine, decade-by-decade, the changes in PM2.5 and associated meteorology, including wind speed, surface temperature inversions, boundary layer height, precipitation, and relative humidity in four cities in India: Chennai, Kolkata, Mumbai, and New Delhi. Forced changes clearly emerge in meteorological variables from 1950 to 2014, including increases in both relative humidity and temperature inversion strength, and decreases in boundary layer height and average surface wind speed. The timing of these changes varies by city: boundary layer heights decrease most over New Delhi in the premonsoon season (ensemble average decrease of 400…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2752-5295/acb22a

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 61 · Cited by 2

Authors
Hancock, S., Fiore, A. M., Westervelt, D. M., Correa, G., Lamarque, J.-F., Venkataraman, C., & Sharma, A.
Affiliations
  • Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory (US)
  • NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research (US)
  • Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IN)
Corresponding author
Hancock, Sarah
Venue
Environmental Research: Climate
Published
2023-01-26
Volume
2
Issue
1
Pages
015003
ISSN
2752-5295 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4315631313
Cited by
2
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1
FWCI
0.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Environmental Research Climate (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
Keywords
PM2.5, air pollution trends, meteorological factors, boundary layer height, temperature inversion, relative humidity, surface wind speed, precipitation, climate noise, CESM2-WACCM6, ensemble climate simulations, anthropogenic emissions, air quality, India, New Delhi, Mumbai, Kolkata, Chennai

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review