Treatment of Fluconazole-Refractory Oropharyngeal Candidiasis with Itraconazole Oral Solution in HIV-Positive Patients
Abstract
This open-label, multicenter trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of a new oral solution formulation of itraconazole in HIV+/AIDS patients with fluconazole-refractory oropharyngeal candidiasis. Seventy-four HIV+/AIDS patients with mycologically confirmed oropharyngeal candidiasis who failed fluconazole therapy (200 mg/day) were treated with 100 mg of itraconazole oral solution administered twice daily (200 mg/day) for 14 days. Patients who demonstrated an incomplete response to treatment were treated for an additional 14 days (28 days total). Clinical responders were eligible for participation in a separate 6-month maintenance protocol. If they declined further treatment, responders were monitored for 6 weeks posttreatment. The primary efficacy parameter was clinical response (i.e., no lesions or symptoms) at end of treatment. Fungal cultures were performed at baseline and at the end of treatment. Among the 74 patients who had mycologically confirmed, fluconazole-unresponsive, oropharyngeal candidiasis at baseline, 41 (55%) achieved a clinical response by day 28. The median time to response was 7 days (range, 7 to 28 days). Candida albicans was the most common pathogen isolated, either alone (62%) or in combination with another Candida species (31%). All 22 patients who entered the optional, off-therapy, 6-week follow-up phase relapsed; mean time to relapse was 13 days. Itraconazole oral solution was well-tolerated; adverse events were predominantly gastrointestinal disturbances. This trial demonstrates that itraconazole oral solution is a useful therapy in the treatment of HIV-infected patients with fluconazole-refractory oropharyngeal candidiasis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Between 64% and 80% of patients with fluconazole-refractory oropharyngeal candidiasis respond to itraconazole solution.
“Between 64% and 80% of patients with fluconazole-refractory infections will respond to treatment with itraconazole solution [268][269][270].”
From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [270]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 29 · Cited by 79
- Authors
- Saag, M. S., Fessel, W. J., Kaufman, C. A., Merrill, K. W., Ward, D. J., Moskovitz, B. L., Thomas, C., Oleka, N., Guarnieri, J. A., Lee, J., Brenner-Gati, L., & Klausner, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
- ORCID
- Saag, Michael S.
- Venue
- AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 1413-1417
- ISSN
- 0889-2229 (ISSN-L)
- 1931-8405
- OpenAlex
- W2045636136
- Cited by
- 79
- References
- 29
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 19 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 3.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › HIV/AIDS oral health manifestations
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
- Keywords
- oropharyngeal candidiasis, fluconazole resistance, HIV infection, AIDS, antifungal therapy, Candida albicans, treatment efficacy, drug safety, relapse, maintenance therapy
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Oral, Adult, Antifungal Agents, Candida, Candida albicans, Candidiasis, Oral, Drug Resistance, Microbial, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Fluconazole, Treatment Outcome, AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections, Itraconazole
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review