Redistribution of Neurofilaments and Accumulation of β -Amyloid Protein after Brain Injury by Rotational Acceleration of the Head
Abstract
Rotational acceleration of the head, as occurs in falls, car crashes, and sport injuries, may result in diffuse brain damage, with acute and chronic neurological and psychiatric symptoms. The present study addresses the effects of rotational trauma on the neuronal cytoskeleton, which stabilizes perikaryal, dendritic and axonal shape and function. The study focuses upon the distribution of (1) the phosphorylated form of the heavy neurofilament subunit, (2) the light neurofilament subunit, and (3) beta-amyloid, a marker for brain injury. While normally restricted to axons, the phosphorylated heavy neurofilament subunits were drastically decreased in the axons after rotational trauma. Instead, they accumulated in the neuronal perikarya, normally devoid of the phosphorylated subunit. This alteration was seen, not only in the cerebral cortex, but also in the hippocampus, the cervical spinal cord, the cerebellum, the cranial nerves and the pyramidal tract. The distribution of the light subunit of neurofilaments was also altered post trauma. Only a weak beta-amyloid immunoreactivity was detected in the brains of control animals. Promptly after the trauma, a large number of beta-amyloid positive neurons appeared. Intensely co-localized immunoreactivity for the light subunit of neurofilaments and of beta-amyloid was seen 3 days after the rotational trauma axons of in the subcortical white matter and in the granule cell layer of the dentate gyrus as well as in neurons of the hypoglossa…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Aβ deposition is apparent following rotational acceleration TBI in pigs and rabbits.
“Although Aβ deposition is apparent following rotational acceleration TBI in pigs (132, 133) and rabbits (134)”
From The Inflammatory Continuum of Traumatic Brain Injury and Alzheimer’s Disease (2018) · cites this paper as [134]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 43 · Cited by 64
- Authors
- Hamberger, A., Huang, Y.-L., Zhu, H., Bao, F., Ding, M., Blennow, K., Olsson, A., Hansson, H.-A., Viano, D., & Haglid, K. G.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- Institute of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Göteborg, Göteborg, Sweden
- Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
- Venue
- Journal of Neurotrauma
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-02
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 169-178
- ISSN
- 0897-7151 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9042
- OpenAlex
- W2092154363
- Cited by
- 64
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2023: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 2.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Neurotrauma (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Automotive and Human Injury Biomechanics
- Keywords
- angular acceleration, traumatic brain injury, neurofilaments, amyloid-beta, neurofilament phosphorylation, neuronal cytoskeleton, axons, perikarya, hippocampus, cerebral cortex, cerebellum, cervical spinal cord, dentate gyrus, hypoglossal nucleus, white matter, diffuse brain damage, closed head injury
- MeSH terms
- Acceleration, Animals, Brain, Brain Injuries, Immunohistochemistry, Phosphorylation, Rabbits, Rotation, Tissue Distribution, Amyloid beta-Peptides, Neurofilament Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review