Cited by 83Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesNeuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations

Does Stimulant Treatment Place Children at Risk for Adult Substance Abuse? A Controlled, Prospective Follow-up Study

Mannuzza, Salvatore, Klein, Rachel G., Moulton, John L.·2003·Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology

Abstract

The sensitization hypothesis posits a neuroadaptation model in which exposure to stimulants results in dopamine system alterations that, in turn, increase sensitivity to the reinforcing effects of the previously experienced drug. This study examines whether stimulant treatment in childhood confers increased risk for substance use and abuse in later life, as the model predicts. Children, ages 7-12 years, with developmental reading disorders but no other psychiatric diagnoses were randomly assigned to methylphenidate treatment (n = 43) or matching placebo (n = 66) for 12-18 weeks. At 16-year follow-up (mean age 26 years), 94% of probands and 129 normal comparisons were evaluated by trained clinicians who were blind to group and treatment status. There were no significant differences between groups on the prevalence of substance use disorder (abuse or dependence) for any of the seven drug categories studied. There were no significant group differences among substance abusers regarding age at onset, duration, or number of episodes of substance abuse and dependence. Significantly more normals (60%) than treated (46%) and untreated probands (41%) ever used stimulants in adolescence or adulthood. Findings from this randomized trial contradict the notion that stimulant treatment in childhood leads to substance use or abuse in later life. The sensitization hypothesis is not supported.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/104454603322572606

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 35 · Cited by 83

Authors
Mannuzza, S., Klein, R. G., & Moulton, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research (US)
  • New York University (US)
Venue
Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
Published
2003-09
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
273-282
ISSN
  • 1044-5463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8992
OpenAlex
W2038225338
Cited by
83
References
35
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (1r03da013910-01)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH-18579, R01MH018579)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA13910)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations
Keywords
methylphenidate, stimulant medication, childhood ADHD, substance abuse, substance use disorders, dopaminergic system, neural adaptation, long-term follow-up
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Central Nervous System Stimulants, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Marriage, Methylphenidate, Prospective Studies, Socioeconomic Factors, Risk Assessment, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review