The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Endoscopic Thyroidectomy for Solitary Thyroid Nodules
Abstract
Conventional thyroidectomy often leaves an undesirable scar on the anterior neck. The aim of this study was to assess the feasibility and efficacy of endoscopic thyroidectomy, a new minimally invasive technique for thyroid surgery. Between September 1998 and February 2000, 18 patients with a solitary thyroid nodule underwent endoscopic thyroidectomy utilizing CO2 insufflation. There were 16 females and 2 males with a mean age of 43 years (range 17-66 years). Indications for surgery included indeterminate cytology (n = 8), follicular neoplasm (n = 8), Hürthle cell neoplasm (n = 1), and toxic thyroid nodule (n = 1). The mean nodule diameter was 2.7 cm (0.6-7 cm). Analgesic requirement, return to normal activity, and cosmetic results were compared to 18 consecutive patients who had conventional thyroidectomy. Sixteen of 18 cases were successfully completed endoscopically with a mean operating time of 220 minutes (range, 120-330 minutes). There were no major complications, but 3 patients developed mild hypercarbia and 1 patient had an incidental parathyroidectomy. When compared to conventional thyroidectomy, patients undergoing endoscopic thyroidectomy had a significantly superior cosmetic result (p < 0.005) and a quicker return to normal activity (p < 0.05), but there was no difference in analgesic requirement. Endoscopic thyroidectomy is a technically feasible and safe procedure that leads to an improved cosmetic result and a quicker recovery. Open completion thyroidectomy is recommended for thyroid carcinoma until more data are available.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Management of Simple Nodular Goiter: Current Status and Future Perspectives
Hegedüs, L., Bonnema, S. J., & Bennedbæk, F. N. (2003) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2002-0016 · Cited by 710
Kang, S.-W., Lee, S. C., Lee, S. H., Lee, K. Y., Jeong, J. J., Lee, Y. S., Nam, K.-H., Chang, H. S., Chung, W. Y., & Park, C. S. (2009) · Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.surg.2009.09.007 · Cited by 447
Bellantone, R., Lombardi, C. P., Raffaelli, M., Boscherini, M., de Crea, C., Alesina, P. F., Traini, E., & Princi, P. (2002) · Asian Journal of Surgery · doi:10.1016/s1015-9584(09)60198-6 · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Gagner, M., & Inabnet, W. B.
- Venue
- Thyroid
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-02
- Volume
- 11
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 161-163
- ISSN
- 1050-7256 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9077
- OpenAlex
- W2148894833
- Cited by
- 210
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Endoscopic Thyroidectomy for Solitary Thyroid Nodules. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/105072501300042848
- The paper
- Gagner, M., & Inabnet, W. B. (2001). Endoscopic Thyroidectomy for Solitary Thyroid Nodules. Thyroid. https://doi.org/10.1089/105072501300042848
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.