The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Finding Motifs Using Random Projections
Abstract
The DNA motif discovery problem abstracts the task of discovering short, conserved sites in genomic DNA. Pevzner and Sze recently described a precise combinatorial formulation of motif discovery that motivates the following algorithmic challenge: find twenty planted occurrences of a motif of length fifteen in roughly twelve kilobases of genomic sequence, where each occurrence of the motif differs from its consensus in four randomly chosen positions. Such "subtle" motifs, though statistically highly significant, expose a weakness in existing motif-finding algorithms, which typically fail to discover them. Pevzner and Sze introduced new algorithms to solve their (15,4)-motif challenge, but these methods do not scale efficiently to more difficult problems in the same family, such as the (14,4)-, (16,5)-, and (18,6)-motif problems. We introduce a novel motif-discovery algorithm, PROJECTION, designed to enhance the performance of existing motif finders using random projections of the input's substrings. Experiments on synthetic data demonstrate that PROJECTION remedies the weakness observed in existing algorithms, typically solving the difficult (14,4)-, (16,5)-, and (18,6)-motif problems. Our algorithm is robust to nonuniform background sequence distributions and scales to larger amounts of sequence than that specified in the original challenge. A probabilistic estimate suggests that related motif-finding problems that PROJECTION fails to solve are in all likelihood inherently intractable. We also test the performance of our algorithm on realistic biological examples, including transcription factor binding sites in eukaryotes and ribosome binding sites in prokaryotes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Maximum Likelihood from Incomplete Data Via the EM Algorithm
Dempster, A. P., Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.2517-6161.1977.tb01600.x · Cited by 50,444
Extensions of Lipschitz mappings into a Hilbert space
Johnson, W. B., & Lindenstrauss, J. (1984) · Contemporary Mathematics · doi:10.1090/conm/026/737400 · Cited by 2,523
Detecting Subtle Sequence Signals: a Gibbs Sampling Strategy for Multiple Alignment
Lawrence, C. E., Altschul, S. F., Boguski, M. S., Liu, J. S., Neuwald, A. F., & Wootton, J. C. (1993) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.8211139 · Cited by 1,807
Comparison of initiation of protein synthesis in procaryotes, eucaryotes, and organelles
Kozak, M. (1983) · Microbiological Reviews · doi:10.1128/mmbr.47.1.1-45.1983 · Cited by 1,502
Hertz, G. Z., & Stormo, G. D. (1999) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/15.7.563 · Cited by 1,243
TRANSFAC: a database on transcription factors and their DNA binding sites
Wingender, E. (1996) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/24.1.238 · Cited by 1,054
van Helden, J., André, B., & Collado-Vides, J. (1998) · Journal of Molecular Biology · doi:10.1006/jmbi.1998.1947 · Cited by 741
Unsupervised learning of multiple motifs in biopolymers using expectation maximization
Bailey, T. L., & Elkan, C. (1995) · Machine Learning · doi:10.1007/bf00993379 · Cited by 670
On lipschitz embedding of finite metric spaces in Hilbert space
Bourgain, J. (1985) · Israel Journal of Mathematics · doi:10.1007/bf02776078 · Cited by 560
Geometric hashing: an overview
Wolfson, H. J., & Rigoutsos, I. (1997) · IEEE Computational Science and Engineering · doi:10.1109/99.641604 · Cited by 557
Cited by
Experiencing SAX: A novel symbolic representation of time series
Lin, J., Keogh, E., Wei, L., & Lonardi, S. (2007) · Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery · doi:10.1007/s10618-007-0064-z · Cited by 1,618
Near-optimal hashing algorithms for approximate nearest neighbor in high dimensions
Andoni, A., & Indyk, P. (2008) · Communications of the ACM · doi:10.1145/1327452.1327494 · Cited by 1,437
Very sparse random projections
Li, P., Hastie, T. J., & Church, K. W. (2006) · Proceedings of the 12th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/1150402.1150436 · Cited by 621
Probabilistic discovery of time series motifs
Chiu, B., Keogh, E., & Lonardi, S. (2003) · Proceedings of the ninth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining · doi:10.1145/956750.956808 · Cited by 573
A survey of DNA motif finding algorithms
Das, M. K., & Dai, H.-K. (2007) · BMC Bioinformatics · doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-s7-s21 · Cited by 429
Metadata
- Authors
- Buhler, J., & Tompa, M.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Biology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 225-242
- ISSN
- 1066-5277 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8666
- OpenAlex
- W2028904582
- Cited by
- 532
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 37.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Finding Motifs Using Random Projections. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/10665270252935430
- The paper
- Buhler, J., & Tompa, M. (2002). Finding Motifs Using Random Projections. Journal of Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1089/10665270252935430
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.