The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
Sickle Cell Telemedicine and Standard Clinical Encounters: A Comparison of Patient Satisfaction
Abstract
Objectives To determine patient satisfaction with telemedicine encounters among adults with sickle cell disease and compare their scores with SCD patients who have standard medical encounters (as controls). Methods Adults patients were recruited from a list of participants in sickle cell telemedicine clinics and prospectively at the time of clinic encounter. Patients were assigned to telemedicine or standard encounter groups. Demographic and pertinent clinical data were obtained for all subjects, and the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8) was administered. Patients were also asked for open-ended comments regarding their satisfaction with the service. Their responses were recorded verbatim. Results Patients with telemedicine (n = 60) and standard encounters (n = 60) were comparable in gender, genotype, education, employment, and mean number of sickle cell disease-related complications. Patients in the telemedicine group were younger (p Conclusions While some patients expressed concern about confidentiality with telemedicine, the benefits of improved access and continuity of care were recognized, and overall satisfaction with telemedicine was high. These findings support the use of telemedicine as an acceptable health care delivery option for rural, underserved populations with sickle cell disease.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Similar findings on patient satisfaction in telemedicine have been reported in other RCTs.
“Similar findings have also been reported in other RCTs of patient satisfaction in telemedicine.”
From Telemedicine in dermatology: a randomised controlled trial (2006) · cites this paper as [41]
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 25 · Cited by 30
Research works printed but not linked: 23
- 1983, Program Planning, 6, 299, 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90010-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1258/1357633971930869 · DOI
- 10.1001/jama.276.4.267 · DOI
- 10.1097/00005537-199801000-00001 · DOI
- 10.1258/1357633971930436 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.313.7069.1377 · DOI
- 10.1001/archderm.133.2.197 · DOI
- 10.1089/tmj.1.1998.4.353 · DOI
- Burghgraeve P, 1995, J Telemed Telecare, 1, 157, 10.1177/1357633X9500100305 · DOI
- 10.1258/1357633971931174 · DOI
- 10.1258/1357633971930788 · DOI
- 10.1001/archderm.134.4.471 · DOI
- 10.1258/1357633981931254 · DOI
- 10.1258/1357633961929402 · DOI
- Pascoe D, 1982, Dimensions Health Service, 59, 32
- Attkisson CC, 1994, Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 402
- 10.1016/0149-7189(89)90038-4 · DOI
- 10.1016/0149-7189(83)90010-1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2105/AJPH.84.10.1693 · DOI
- Wyn R, 1997, J Am Med Wom Assoc, 52, 60
- Ballas SK, 1996, Philadelphia: Thomas Jefferson University, 271
- 10.1056/NEJM199609123351106 · DOI
- 10.1016/0735-6757(95)90163-9 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Woods, K. F., Kutlar, A., Johnson, J. A., Waller, J. L., Grigsby, R. K., Stachura, M. E., & Rahn, D. W.
- Affiliations
- Augusta University (US)
- Venue
- Telemedicine Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 349-356
- ISSN
- 1078-3024 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2174185579
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Telemedicine Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Genetics (clinical) › Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
- Keywords
- sickle cell disease, telemedicine, patient satisfaction, Client Satisfaction Questionnaire, confidentiality concerns, continuity of care, rural and underserved populations, hydroxyurea, Medicaid, health care access
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Confidentiality, Female, Georgia, Humans, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Regional Medical Programs, Sickle Cell Trait, Patient Satisfaction, Rural Health Services, Remote Consultation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review