Cited by 30Urinary Tract Infections ManagementEscherichia coli research studiesReproductive tract infections research

Relatedness of Escherichia coli Colonizing Women Longitudinally

Navas-Nacher, Elena L., Dardick, Frederick, Venegas, Mario F., Anderson, Byron E., Schaeffer, Anthony J., Duncan, James L.·2001·Molecular Urology

Abstract

Purpose The longitudinal colonization patterns by Escherichia coli of the vaginal introitus and urinary tract were investigated. Materials and methods Cultures of the vaginal introitus and midstream urine were collected once a week for 12 consecutive weeks from five women with (patients) and five without (controls) a history of urinary tract infection (UTI). Results A total of 63 E. coli isolates was obtained from the 10 women, 26 from controls and 37 from patients. The bacterial counts of E. coli present in control individuals were uniformly low, 10(5)/mL in urine and vaginal specimens. In 16 instances, E. coli was present in the urine and the vaginal introitus concurrently (matched isolates). Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) fingerprinting was used to characterize all matched E. coli isolates. Concurrent vaginal and urinary tract colonization was more common in the patient population, and usually, the same E. coli strain was present at both sites; only 15% of the matched isolates represented different strains. The RAPD fingerprinting was also carried out on selected isolates recovered from four patients and three control individuals over the 12-week study period. Colonization of the vaginal introitus and urinary tract in these individuals varied over time. Generally, however, a predominant E. coli strain was present in the vaginal milieu, urinary tract, or both, either continuously (for as long as 9 consecutive weeks in one patient) or intermittently. Conclusion The…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/109153601750124285

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Navas-Nacher, E. L., Dardick, F., Venegas, M. F., Anderson, B. E., Schaeffer, A. J., & Duncan, J. L.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Abbott (United States) (US)
Venue
Molecular Urology
Published
2001-03
Volume
5
Issue
1
Pages
31-36
ISSN
1091-5362 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000669924
Cited by
30
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.48
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Molecular Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (DK 42648)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Urinary Tract Infections Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Endocrinology › Escherichia coli research studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Reproductive tract infections research
Keywords
Escherichia coli, vaginal colonization, urinary tract colonization, urinary tract infection, vaginal introitus, RAPD-PCR, strain relatedness, bacterial reservoir, women
MeSH terms
Escherichia coli, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Mucous Membrane, Urinary Tract, Urinary Tract Infections, Vagina, Women's Health, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review