Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 659

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gender Differences in Internet Use Patterns and Internet Application Preferences: A Two-Sample Comparison

Weiser, Eric B.·2000·CyberPsychology & Behavior

Abstract

Although the Internet frequently has been characterized as male-dominated, recent evidence indicates that the gender gap in Internet use is rapidly diminishing. If more females are using the Internet, then what specific applications do they prefer and do they differ from those of males? This article presents results from a survey assessing gender differences in specific uses of the Internet. The survey included 19 items and was made available to Internet users. For comparison, a paper-and-pencil version was administered to several hundred introductory psychology students. Numerous gender differences in preferences for specific Internet applications emerged. Results showed that males use the Internet mainly for purposes related to entertainment and leisure, whereas women use it primarily for interpersonal communication and educational assistance. However, additional analyses showed that several gender differences were mediated by differences in age and Internet experience. Potential implications of these results for commerce and advertising are discussed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/109493100316012

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Kraut R., 1998, CHI, 1998, 18
  2. 10.1007/BF00287909 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/0360-1315(93)90085-W · DOI
  4. 10.1007/BF00287912 · DOI · Paper page
  5. 10.1007/BF01544189 · DOI
  6. 10.1287/mnsc.36.6.739 · DOI
  7. 10.1007/BF00287568 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/BF00289989 · DOI
  9. Johnson F.L., 1983, Women's Studies International Forum, 6, 353, 10.1016/0277-5395(83)90027-4 · DOI
  10. Rubin Z., 1986, Psychoanalytic Review, 73, 165

Cited by

See all 659

Metadata

Authors
Weiser, E. B.
Venue
CyberPsychology & Behavior
Published
2000-04
Volume
3
Issue
2
Pages
167-178
ISSN
  • 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8364
OpenAlex
W1980241046
Cited by
659
References
1
FWCI
12.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.liebertpub.com/nv/resources-tools/text-and-data-mining-policy/121/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender Differences in Internet Use Patterns and Internet Application Preferences: A Two-Sample Comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/109493100316012
The paper
Weiser, E. B. (2000). Gender Differences in Internet Use Patterns and Internet Application Preferences: A Two-Sample Comparison. CyberPsychology & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493100316012

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.