The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Gender Differences in Internet Use Patterns and Internet Application Preferences: A Two-Sample Comparison
Abstract
Although the Internet frequently has been characterized as male-dominated, recent evidence indicates that the gender gap in Internet use is rapidly diminishing. If more females are using the Internet, then what specific applications do they prefer and do they differ from those of males? This article presents results from a survey assessing gender differences in specific uses of the Internet. The survey included 19 items and was made available to Internet users. For comparison, a paper-and-pencil version was administered to several hundred introductory psychology students. Numerous gender differences in preferences for specific Internet applications emerged. Results showed that males use the Internet mainly for purposes related to entertainment and leisure, whereas women use it primarily for interpersonal communication and educational assistance. However, additional analyses showed that several gender differences were mediated by differences in age and Internet experience. Potential implications of these results for commerce and advertising are discussed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The functions of internet use and their social and psychological consequences
Weiser, E. B. (2001) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/109493101753376678 · Cited by 343
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Kraut R., 1998, CHI, 1998, 18
- 10.1007/BF00287909 · DOI
- 10.1016/0360-1315(93)90085-W · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00287912 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF01544189 · DOI
- 10.1287/mnsc.36.6.739 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00287568 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/BF00289989 · DOI
- Johnson F.L., 1983, Women's Studies International Forum, 6, 353, 10.1016/0277-5395(83)90027-4 · DOI
- Rubin Z., 1986, Psychoanalytic Review, 73, 165
Cited by
Raacke, J., & Bonds-Raacke, J. (2008) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2007.0056 · Cited by 1,577
Gender and attitudes toward technology use: A meta-analysis
Cai, Z., Fan, X., & Du, J. (2017) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2016.11.003 · Cited by 728
Friends, Fans, and Followers: Do Ads Work on Social Networks?: How Gender and Age Shape Receptivity
Taylor, D. G., Lewin, J. E., & Strutton, D. (2011) · Journal of Advertising Research · doi:10.2501/jar-51-1-258-275 · Cited by 656
Make new friends or keep the old: Gender and personality differences in social networking use
Muscanell, N. L., & Guadagno, R. E. (2012) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.016 · Cited by 649
Revisiting gender differences: what we know and what lies ahead.
Meyers‐Levy, J., & Loken, B. (2015) · Journal of Consumer Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jcps.2014.06.003 · Cited by 614
Metadata
- Authors
- Weiser, E. B.
- Venue
- CyberPsychology & Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-04
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 167-178
- ISSN
- 1094-9313 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8364
- OpenAlex
- W1980241046
- Cited by
- 659
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 12.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.liebertpub.com/nv/resources-tools/text-and-data-mining-policy/121/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Gender Differences in Internet Use Patterns and Internet Application Preferences: A Two-Sample Comparison. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/109493100316012
- The paper
- Weiser, E. B. (2000). Gender Differences in Internet Use Patterns and Internet Application Preferences: A Two-Sample Comparison. CyberPsychology & Behavior. https://doi.org/10.1089/109493100316012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.