The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Limitations of Patient Satisfaction Studies in Telehealthcare: A Systematic Review of the Literature
Abstract
The objective of this study is to provide a systematic review of studies on patient satisfaction with telemedicine. The review included empirical studies that investigated patient satisfaction with that telemedicine service. The search strategy involved matching at least one of 11 'telemedicine' terms with one of 5 'satisfaction' terms. The following databases were searched: Telemedicine Information Exchange (TIE) database, MEDLINE, Science Citation Index (SCI), Social Science Citation Index (SSCI), Psycinfo, and Citation Index of Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL). A highly structured instrument was used for data extraction. The review included 93 studies. Telepsychiatry represents the largest portion of these studies (25%), followed by multispecialty care (14%), nursing (11%), and dermatology (8%). Real-time videoconferencing was used in 88% of these studies. Only 19 (20%) included an independent control group, including 9 (10%) randomized control trial (RCT) studies. One third of studies were based on samples of less than 20 patients, and only 21% had samples of over 100 patients. Aspects of patient satisfaction most commonly assessed were: professional-patient interaction, the patient's feeling about the consultation, and technical aspects of the consultation. Only 33% of the studies included a measure of preference between telemedicine and face-to-face consultation. Almost half the studies measured only 1 or 2 dimensions of satisfaction. Reported levels of satisfaction with telemedicine are consistently greater than 80%, and frequently reported at 100%. Progression of telemedicine services from "trial" status to routine health service must be supported by improved research into patients' satisfaction with telemedicine. Further investigation of factors that influence patient acceptance of telemedicine is indicated.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hunkeler, E. M. (2000) · Archives of Family Medicine · doi:10.1001/archfami.9.8.700 · Cited by 464
Wallace, P., Haines, A., Harrison, R., Barbour, J., Thompson, S., Jacklin, P., Roberts, J., Lewis, L., & Wainwright, P. (2002) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08828-1 · Cited by 145
A telemedicine system as a care modality for dementia patients in Korea
Lee, J. H., Kim, J. H., Jhoo, J. H., Lee, K. U., Kim, K. W., Lee, D. Y., & Woo, J. I. (2000) · Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders · doi:10.1097/00002093-200004000-00007 · Cited by 83
Cited by
Kairy, D., Lehoux, P., Vincent, C., & Visintin, M. (2009) · Disability and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1080/09638280802062553 · Cited by 587
Smart homes — Current features and future perspectives
Chan, M., Campo, E., Estève, D., & Fourniols, J.-Y. (2009) · Maturitas · doi:10.1016/j.maturitas.2009.07.014 · Cited by 585
Review of key telepsychiatry outcomes
Hubley, S., Lynch, S. B., Schneck, C., Thomas, M., & Shore, J. (2016) · World Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.5498/wjp.v6.i2.269 · Cited by 492
A rational model for assessing and evaluating complex interventions in health care
May, C. (2006) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/1472-6963-6-86 · Cited by 447
Self-citationBarriers to Use of Telepsychiatry: Clinicians as Gatekeepers
Cowan, K. E., McKean, A. J., Gentry, M. T., & Hilty, D. M. (2019) · Mayo Clinic Proceedings · doi:10.1016/j.mayocp.2019.04.018 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Williams, T. L., May, C. R., & Esmail, A.
- Venue
- Telemedicine Journal and e-Health
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 293-316
- ISSN
- 1530-5627 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2072558507
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 0.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Limitations of Patient Satisfaction Studies in Telehealthcare: A Systematic Review of the Literature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/15305620152814700
- The paper
- Williams, T. L., May, C. R., & Esmail, A. (2001). Limitations of Patient Satisfaction Studies in Telehealthcare: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Telemedicine Journal and e-Health. https://doi.org/10.1089/15305620152814700
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.