Can Enantiomorphic Crystals Like Quartz Play a Role in the Origin of Homochirality on Earth?
Abstract
This communication reviews the possible actions of enantiomorphic crystals on the surface of Earth as sources of homochirality of organic compounds. The discovery of asymmetric adsorption and asymmetric catalysis involving optically active quartz crystals has led some authors to conclude that this source of asymmetry played an important role as a source of homochirality in nature, a concept that later proved erroneous. Moreover, data regarding the preponderance in nature of l-quartz crystals have been used to confirm calculations of the parity violation energy difference (PVED) for l-quartz and, hence, to explain the prevalence of L-amino acids and D-sugars in living matter. As discussed here, quartz and other enantiomorphs such as sodium chlorate can produce chiral intermediates active in autocatalytical processes. Our most recent compilation of the literature, however, reveals that the distribution of d- and l-quartz crystals at the surface of the Earth when all possible locations are included is quite random. Although quartz can serve as an effective asymmetric inductor in autocatalytic processes, it cannot be the source of homochirality of living matter because of the random occurrence of the two types of enantiomorphs. The calculations of PVED values for quartz therefore lack a sound physical basis.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
D-quartz and L-quartz are equally distributed on earth, arguing against quartz as a deterministic source.
“A final argument against the implication of quartz as a deterministic source of chiral discrimination of the molecules of life comes from the fact that D-quartz and L-quartz are equally distributed on earth.257,258”
From Possible chemical and physical scenarios towards biological homochirality (2022) · cites this paper as [258]
No significant bias of one enantiomorphic crystal or surface over the other has been measured when counting is averaged over several locations on earth.
“since no significant bias of one enantiomorphic crystal or surface over the other has been measured when counting is averaged over several locations on earth.257,258”
From Possible chemical and physical scenarios towards biological homochirality (2022) · cites this paper as [258]
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 17 · Cited by 28
- Authors
- Klabunovskii, E. I.
- Affiliations
- Zelinskii Institute of Organic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia.
- Venue
- Astrobiology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-06
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 127-131
- ISSN
- 1531-1074 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8070
- OpenAlex
- W2175628635
- Cited by
- 28
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 0.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Astrobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Organic Chemistry › Chemistry and Stereochemistry Studies
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Calcium Carbonate Crystallization and Inhibition
- Keywords
- homochirality, origin of homochirality, quartz crystal, asymmetric catalysis, L-amino acids, D-sugars, autocatalysis, chiral intermediates, sodium chlorate, prebiotic chemistry
- MeSH terms
- Crystallization, Models, Chemical, Quartz, Stereoisomerism, Earth, Planet, Evolution, Chemical
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review