Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 47

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Comparing the Evidence Relevant to Impact and Flood Basalt at Times of Major Mass Extinctions

Alvarez, Walter·2003·Astrobiology

Abstract

The five major mass extinctions identified in 1982 by Raup and Sepkoski have expanded to six, with the suggestion that the Permian-Triassic extinction was a double event. Is there a general explanation for great mass extinctions, or can they result from different triggers, or even from internal system instabilities? The two most-discussed candidates for a general extinction mechanism are impacts and flood-basalt eruptions. A compilation of evidence for impact at the times of mass extinctions shows that this cause is abundantly confirmed in the case of the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction and the late Eocene, which is a time of minor and gradual extinction, but little or no evidence connects other major extinctions to impact. On the other hand, there is a remarkable time correlation between flood basalts and four major extinctions, but no other evidence that flood basalts cause mass extinctions. The evidence for an impact-extinction linkage is strikingly different from that for a connection between flood basalts and extinctions. Flood basalts cover larger areas than craters and their associated thick ejecta blankets, which are thus less likely to be found. Impacts distribute proxies globally at instantaneous time horizons, whereas flood-basalt events are extended in time, and no remote proxies have been recognized. Many global killing mechanisms have been proposed in the case of impacts, but few have been suggested for flood basalts. It is possible that flood basalts are trigger…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/153110703321632480

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 73

  1. 10.1126/science.208.4448.1095 · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1126/science.216.4548.886 · DOI
  3. 10.1016/S0377-8398(98)00025-5 · DOI
  4. 10.1073/pnas.050519397 · DOI
  5. 10.1126/science.1057243 · DOI
  6. 10.1126/science.255.5043.443 · DOI
  7. 10.1126/science.224.4651.867 · DOI
  8. Bohor B.F., 1990, Meteoritics, 25, 350
  9. 10.1007/BF00375448 · DOI
  10. 10.1038/41073 · DOI
  11. 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00040-0 · DOI
  12. 10.1038/352708a0 · DOI
  13. 10.1126/science.257.5073.1102 · DOI
  14. 10.1038/333843a0 · DOI · Paper page
  15. 10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0779:MLSAIC>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  16. 10.1126/science.280.5367.1250 · DOI
  17. 10.1126/science.209.4459.921 · DOI
  18. 10.1126/science.216.4548.885 · DOI
  19. 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00038-2 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/S0377-8398(97)89276-6 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00046-1 · DOI
  22. 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0371:DOHPZP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  23. 10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021<0435:CASQDI>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/0012-821X(73)90113-1 · DOI
  25. 10.1098/rstb.1989.0098 · DOI
  26. Hallam A., 1999, Rev., 48, 217
  27. 10.1126/science.265.5172.645 · DOI
  28. 10.1126/science.248.4957.843 · DOI
  29. 10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0867:CCAPCT>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  30. 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<1019:DFTIRK>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  31. 10.1029/91JE02249 · DOI
  32. Jin Y., 1994, Can. Soc. Petrol. Geol. Memoir, 17, 813
  33. 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00044-8 · DOI
  34. 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0731:MSAALI>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/S0377-8398(97)00031-5 · DOI
  36. Kring D.A., 2000, GSA Today, 10, 1
  37. 10.1038/24322 · DOI
  38. 10.1038/288651a0 · DOI
  39. 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<1003:SQITAB>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  40. 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00037-0 · DOI
  41. 10.1130/0016-7606(1977)88<374:UCMSAG>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  42. 10.1126/science.222.4624.613 · DOI
  43. 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00041-2 · DOI
  44. 10.1038/343251a0 · DOI
  45. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1987.tb00625.x · DOI
  46. 10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<668:SATCBA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  47. 10.1029/2002GL015938 · DOI
  48. 10.1016/0031-0182(93)90123-Z · DOI
  49. 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00042-4 · DOI
  50. 10.1126/science.214.4527.1341 · DOI
  51. 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00043-6 · DOI
  52. 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0307:ENRSIU>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
  53. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1996.tb02015.x · DOI
  54. 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0099:IDNTCO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  55. 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48358.x · DOI
  56. 10.1126/science.215.4539.1501 · DOI · Paper page
  57. 10.1038/363615a0 · DOI
  58. 10.1126/science.282.5390.927 · DOI
  59. 10.1038/349482a0 · DOI
  60. 10.1038/285198a0 · DOI
  61. 10.1038/292047a0 · DOI
  62. 10.1038/310403a0 · DOI
  63. 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00045-X · DOI
  64. 10.1126/science.266.5189.1340 · DOI
  65. 10.1007/BF00141279 · DOI
  66. 10.1023/A:1005323724072 · DOI
  67. 10.1023/A:1005480105370 · DOI
  68. 10.1023/A:1005523330643 · DOI
  69. 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00450-2 · DOI
  70. 10.1126/science.256.5063.1547 · DOI
  71. Warme J.E., 1995, Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 188, 31
  72. 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2001.tb01814.x · DOI
  73. Wignall P.B., 2001, Rev., 53, 1

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Alvarez, W.
Affiliations
Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California.
Venue
Astrobiology
Published
2003-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
153-161
ISSN
  • 1531-1074
  • 1557-8070
Cited by
47
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review