The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparing the Evidence Relevant to Impact and Flood Basalt at Times of Major Mass Extinctions
Abstract
The five major mass extinctions identified in 1982 by Raup and Sepkoski have expanded to six, with the suggestion that the Permian-Triassic extinction was a double event. Is there a general explanation for great mass extinctions, or can they result from different triggers, or even from internal system instabilities? The two most-discussed candidates for a general extinction mechanism are impacts and flood-basalt eruptions. A compilation of evidence for impact at the times of mass extinctions shows that this cause is abundantly confirmed in the case of the Cretaceous-Tertiary extinction and the late Eocene, which is a time of minor and gradual extinction, but little or no evidence connects other major extinctions to impact. On the other hand, there is a remarkable time correlation between flood basalts and four major extinctions, but no other evidence that flood basalts cause mass extinctions. The evidence for an impact-extinction linkage is strikingly different from that for a connection between flood basalts and extinctions. Flood basalts cover larger areas than craters and their associated thick ejecta blankets, which are thus less likely to be found. Impacts distribute proxies globally at instantaneous time horizons, whereas flood-basalt events are extended in time, and no remote proxies have been recognized. Many global killing mechanisms have been proposed in the case of impacts, but few have been suggested for flood basalts. It is possible that flood basalts are trigger…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Also, there is no compelling evidence to date for other impact/extinction associations (Alvarez, 2003).”
From Triggering of the largest Deccan eruptions by the Chicxulub impact (2015) · cites this paper as Alvarez, 2003
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 73
- 10.1126/science.208.4448.1095 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.216.4548.886 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0377-8398(98)00025-5 · DOI
- 10.1073/pnas.050519397 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.1057243 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.255.5043.443 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.224.4651.867 · DOI
- Bohor B.F., 1990, Meteoritics, 25, 350
- 10.1007/BF00375448 · DOI
- 10.1038/41073 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00040-0 · DOI
- 10.1038/352708a0 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.257.5073.1102 · DOI
- 10.1038/333843a0 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1996)024<0779:MLSAIC>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1126/science.280.5367.1250 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.209.4459.921 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.216.4548.885 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00038-2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0377-8398(97)89276-6 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00046-1 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(2001)029<0371:DOHPZP>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1993)021<0435:CASQDI>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/0012-821X(73)90113-1 · DOI
- 10.1098/rstb.1989.0098 · DOI
- Hallam A., 1999, Rev., 48, 217
- 10.1126/science.265.5172.645 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.248.4957.843 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1991)019<0867:CCAPCT>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<1019:DFTIRK>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/91JE02249 · DOI
- Jin Y., 1994, Can. Soc. Petrol. Geol. Memoir, 17, 813
- 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00044-8 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1997)025<0731:MSAALI>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0377-8398(97)00031-5 · DOI
- Kring D.A., 2000, GSA Today, 10, 1
- 10.1038/24322 · DOI
- 10.1038/288651a0 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1995)023<1003:SQITAB>2.3.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00037-0 · DOI
- 10.1130/0016-7606(1977)88<374:UCMSAG>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.222.4624.613 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00041-2 · DOI
- 10.1038/343251a0 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1987.tb00625.x · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1983)11<668:SATCBA>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1029/2002GL015938 · DOI
- 10.1016/0031-0182(93)90123-Z · DOI
- 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00042-4 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.214.4527.1341 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00043-6 · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(1998)026<0307:ENRSIU>2.3.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.1996.tb02015.x · DOI
- 10.1130/0091-7613(2002)030<0099:IDNTCO>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1749-6632.1997.tb48358.x · DOI
- 10.1126/science.215.4539.1501 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1038/363615a0 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.282.5390.927 · DOI
- 10.1038/349482a0 · DOI
- 10.1038/285198a0 · DOI
- 10.1038/292047a0 · DOI
- 10.1038/310403a0 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0377-8398(96)00045-X · DOI
- 10.1126/science.266.5189.1340 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF00141279 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1005323724072 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1005480105370 · DOI
- 10.1023/A:1005523330643 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0012-821X(01)00450-2 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.256.5063.1547 · DOI
- Warme J.E., 1995, Courier Forschungsinstitut Senckenberg, 188, 31
- 10.1111/j.1945-5100.2001.tb01814.x · DOI
- Wignall P.B., 2001, Rev., 53, 1
Cited by
Triggering of the largest Deccan eruptions by the Chicxulub impact
Richards, M. A., Alvarez, W., Self, S., Karlstrom, L., Renne, P. R., Manga, M., Sprain, C. J., Smit, J., Vanderkluysen, L., & Gibson, S. A. (2015) · Geological Society of America Bulletin · doi:10.1130/b31167.1 · Cited by 210
Metadata
- Authors
- Alvarez, W.
- Affiliations
- Department of Earth and Planetary Science, University of California, Berkeley, California.
- Venue
- Astrobiology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-03
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 153-161
- ISSN
- 1531-1074
- 1557-8070
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review