The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effect of Infill Parameters on Tensile Mechanical Behavior in Desktop 3D Printing
Open accessAbstract
The recent creation and growth of desktop three-dimensional (3D) printing has led to a new way of building objects. In the manufacture of pieces using Open-Source 3D printing it is very common to use a range of infill patterns and densities with the aim of reducing printing time and material consumption. However, it is not well understood how these factors influence the characteristics of the pieces obtained. Due to the differences with FDM technology, it is necessary to evaluate the strength of the pieces manufactured with this technology. In this work, the influence of two controllable variables, such as pattern and density of the infill has been evaluated. A series of test pieces with different density characteristics and infill patterns were produced using an open-source 3D printer. The results obtained show that the influence of the different printing patterns causes a variation of less than 5% in maximum tensile strength, although the behavior is similar. The change in infill density determines mainly the tensile strength. The combination of a rectilinear pattern in a 100% infill shows the higher tensile strength, with a value of 36.4 Mpa, with a difference of less than 1% from raw ABS material.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
FDM process parameters influence over the mechanical properties of polymer specimens: A review
Popescu, D., Zapciu, A., Amza, C., Baciu, F., & Marinescu, R. (2018) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2018.05.020 · Cited by 1,015
Process–Structure–Properties in Polymer Additive Manufacturing via Material Extrusion: A Review
Goh, G. D., Yap, Y. L., Tan, H. K. J., Sing, S. L., Goh, G. L., & Yeong, W. Y. (2020) · Critical Reviews in Solid State and Materials Sciences · doi:10.1080/10408436.2018.1549977 · Cited by 429
Valvez, S., Silva, A. P., & Reis, P. N. B. (2022) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym14132564 · Cited by 195
Yirmibeşoğlu, O. D., Oshiro, T., Olson, G., Palmer, C., & Mengüç, Y. (2019) · Frontiers in Robotics and AI · doi:10.3389/frobt.2019.00040 · Cited by 51
Metadata
- Authors
- Fernandez-Vicente, M., Calle, W., Ferrandiz, S., & Conejero, A.
- Venue
- 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 183-192
- ISSN
- 2329-7662 (ISSN-L)
- 2329-7670
- OpenAlex
- W2535126853
- Cited by
- 535
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 30.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effect of Infill Parameters on Tensile Mechanical Behavior in Desktop 3D Printing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/3dp.2015.0036
- The paper
- Fernandez-Vicente, M., Calle, W., Ferrandiz, S., & Conejero, A. (2016). Effect of Infill Parameters on Tensile Mechanical Behavior in Desktop 3D Printing. 3D Printing and Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1089/3dp.2015.0036
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.