CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 354Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsNeural dynamics and brain functionPain Management and Placebo Effect

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Increased Theta and Alpha EEG Activity During Nondirective Meditation

Lagopoulos, Jim, Xu, Jian, Rasmussen, Inge, Vik, Alexandra, Malhi, Gin S., Eliassen, Carl F., Arntsen, Ingrid E., Sæther, Jardar G., Hollup, Stig, Holen, Are, Davanger, Svend, Ellingsen, Øyvind·2009·The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
DOI 10.1089/acm.2009.0113
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In recent years, there has been significant uptake of meditation and related relaxation techniques, as a means of alleviating stress and maintaining good health. Despite its popularity, little is known about the neural mechanisms by which meditation works, and there is a need for more rigorous investigations of the underlying neurobiology. Several electroencephalogram (EEG) studies have reported changes in spectral band frequencies during meditation inspired by techniques that focus on concentration, and in comparison much less has been reported on mindfulness and nondirective techniques that are proving to be just as popular. DESIGN: The present study examined EEG changes during nondirective meditation. The investigational paradigm involved 20 minutes of acem meditation, where the subjects were asked to close their eyes and adopt their normal meditation technique, as well as a separate 20-minute quiet rest condition where the subjects were asked to close their eyes and sit quietly in a state of rest. Both conditions were completed in the same experimental session with a 15-minute break in between. RESULTS: Significantly increased theta power was found for the meditation condition when averaged across all brain regions. On closer examination, it was found that theta was significantly greater in the frontal and temporal-central regions as compared to the posterior region. There was also a significant increase in alpha power in the meditation condition compared to the rest condition, when averaged across all brain regions, and it was found that alpha was significantly greater in the posterior region as compared to the frontal region. CONCLUSIONS: These findings from this study suggest that nondirective meditation techniques alter theta and alpha EEG patterns significantly more than regular relaxation, in a manner that is perhaps similar to methods based on mindfulness or concentration.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/acm.2009.0113

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 22 references

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Aftanas LI, 2003, Fiziol Cheloveka, 29, 18
  2. Ellingsen O, 2008, Fighting Stress: Reviews of Meditation Research, 11
  3. Solberg E, 2004, Med Sci Monit, 10, CR96
  4. Kasamatsu A, 1966, Folia Psychiatr Neurol Jpn, 20, 315
  5. Faber P, 2004, International Society for Neuronal Regulation Winterthur Switzerland
  6. Westlund P, 2008, Fighting Stress: Reviews of Meditation Research, 129

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–300 of 353

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Lagopoulos, J., Xu, J., Rasmussen, I., Vik, A., Malhi, G. S., Eliassen, C. F., Arntsen, I. E., Sæther, J. G., Hollup, S., Holen, A., Davanger, S., & Ellingsen, Ø.
Affiliations
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
Corresponding author
Lagopoulos, Jim
ORCID
Venue
The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2009-11
Volume
15
Issue
11
Pages
1187-1192
ISSN
  • 1075-5535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-7708
DOI
10.1089/acm.2009.0113
OpenAlex
W1998657013
Cited by
354
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 26 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 42 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 35 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 33 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 7
FWCI
5.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Australasian College for Emergency Medicine
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
  • Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Mathematical and Statistical Frontiers
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
Keywords
theta power, alpha power, mindfulness, relaxation, posterior brain regions
MeSH terms
Adult, Alpha Rhythm, Analysis of Variance, Brain, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Relaxation, Theta Rhythm, Meditation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review