The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Discrepancy Between Clinical Course and Drug-Induced Lymphocyte Stimulation Tests in a Case of Saireito -Induced Liver Injury Accompanied by Sjögren Syndrome
Abstract
Background Saireito consists of components of shosaikoto and goreisan. There are several reports of liver injury caused by shosaikoto and saireito, whereas cases caused by goreisan are rarely seen. Patient A 70-year-old woman suffered from sicca of the eyes and oral cavity that arose in 2003. In June 2004, we diagnosed her as having Sjögren syndrome on the basis of Schirmer's test, salivary scintigraphy, presence of anti-SS-A/Ro antibody, and subjective symptoms. Although a muscarinic agonist was commenced, her sicca symptoms did not improve. Interventions In February 2008, 7.5 g/day of shosaikoto extract granules (for ethical use, Tsumura & Co., Tokyo, Japan) was introduced. Her symptoms and laboratory data did not change. The next month, the treatment was replaced by 9.0 g/day of saireito extract granules (for ethical use, Tsumura & Co., Tokyo, Japan). Results After 10 weeks, elevation of liver enzymes was observed. On suspicion of drug-induced liver injury (DILI), saireito was withdrawn, and the patient's liver enzymes returned to normal the next month. Drug-induced lymphocyte stimulation tests (DLSTs) for saireito, shosaikoto, and goreisan were all positive. Conclusions The clinical course suggested allergy to the goreisan component of saireito. It is important to be aware of the limitation of DLST as a diagnostic tool for DILI, especially for herbal medicines.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In Japan, the report of Tsuda et al.39 used the RUCAM of 1993 but there are no other RUCAM-based cases of HILI to be used for comparison with worldwide RUCAM-based HILI cases.”
From Herb-induced Liver Injury in Asia and Current Role of RUCAM for Causality Assessment in 11,160 Published Cases (2020) · cites this paper as [39]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- 10.1016/S0378-8741(00)00334-2 · DOI
- Ohno S, 2007, J Trad Med, 24, 73
- 10.1212/WNL.53.2.434 · DOI
- 10.1177/0961203307086640 · DOI
- Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, 1991, J Rheumatol, 18, 44
- 10.1159/000096919 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1872-034X.2008.00486.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1078/0944-7113-00141 · DOI
- 10.1016/0895-4356(93)90101-6 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/j.hepres.2005.05.007 · DOI
- 10.2957/kanzo.46.85 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1440-1746.2006.03373.x · DOI
- 10.1016/S1726-4901(09)70119-4 · DOI
- 10.1248/bpb.18.757 · DOI
- 10.1248/bpb.20.759 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Teschke, R., Zhu, Y., & Jing, J. (2020) · Journal of Clinical and Translational Hepatology · doi:10.14218/jcth.2020.00009 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Tsuda, T., Yashiro, S., Gamo, Y., Watanabe, K., Hoshino, T., Oikawa, T., & Hanawa, T.
- Affiliations
- Department of Oriental Medicine, Doctoral Program of Medical Science, Kitasato University Graduate School, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
- Department of Psychiatry, National Hospital Organization Sagamihara National Hospital, Sagamihara, Kanagawa, Japan.
- Watanabe OBGY & Kampo Clinic, Saitama, Japan.
- Oriental Medicine Research Center, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.
- Department of Clinical Research, Oriental Medicine Research Center, Kitasato University, Tokyo, Japan.
- Venue
- The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2010-04
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 501-505
- ISSN
- 1075-5535
- 1557-7708
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review