Monitoring the Neural Activity of the State of Mental Silence While Practicing Sahaja Yoga Meditation
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To identify the neural correlates of the state of mental silence as experienced through Sahaja yoga meditation. DESIGN: Nineteen experienced meditators underwent functional magnetic resonance imaging during three short consecutive meditation periods, contrasted with a control relaxation condition. RESULTS: Relative to baseline, at the beginning of the meditation sessions there was a significant increase of activation in bilateral inferior frontal and temporal regions. Activation became progressively more reduced with deeper meditation stages and in the last meditation session it became localized to the right inferior frontal cortex/ right insula and right middle/superior temporal cortex. Furthermore, right inferior frontal activation was directly associated with the subjective depth of the mental silence experience. CONCLUSIONS: Meditators appear to pass through an initial intense neural self-control process necessary to silence their mind. After this they experience relatively reduced brain activation concomitant with the deepening of the state of mental silence over right inferior frontal cortex, probably reflecting an effortless process of attentional contemplation associated with this state.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
There exists a dynamic process for brain activation by meditation: at the beginning, bilateral subfrontal and temporal regions are obviously activated; as meditation deepens, activation weakens and concentrates on the right subfrontal cortex/right insula and the meso/epithelial layer of right temporal lobe.
“Moreover, there exists a dynamic process for brain activation by meditation. At the beginning of meditation, the bilateral subfrontal and temporal regions are obviously activated. As the meditation process goes deeper, the activation becomes weak by degrees, with activation concentrating just on the right subfrontal cortex/right insula and the meso/epithelial layer of right temporal lobe in the”
From Biological mechanism study of meditation and its application in mental disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [12]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 27 · Cited by 39
- Authors
- Hernández, S. E., Suero, J., Rubia, K., & González-Mora, J. L.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
- Madrid Health Service (ES)
- King's College London (GB)
- Department of Fisiología, Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain.
- Corresponding author
- Hernández, Sergio E.
- Venue
- The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-03
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 175-179
- ISSN
- 1075-5535 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-7708
- OpenAlex
- W1962999584
- Cited by
- 39
- References
- 27
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 3.72
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Alternative and Complementary Medicine (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Mind wandering and attention
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
- Keywords
- neural correlates of meditation, inferior frontal cortex, insula, temporal cortex, self-control
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Brain, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Yoga, Meditation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review