Cited by 16Space Science and Extraterrestrial LifeSpace exploration and regulationPlanetary Science and Exploration

Astrobiological Benefits of Human Space Exploration

Crawford, Ian A.·2010·Astrobiology

Abstract

An ambitious program of human space exploration, such as that envisaged in the Global Exploration Strategy and considered in the Augustine Commission report, will help advance the core aims of astrobiology in multiple ways. In particular, a human exploration program will confer significant benefits in the following areas: (i) the exploitation of the lunar geological record to elucidate conditions on early Earth; (ii) the detailed study of near-Earth objects for clues relating to the formation of the Solar System; (iii) the search for evidence of past or present life on Mars; (iv) the provision of a heavy-lift launch capacity that will facilitate exploration of the outer Solar System; and (v) the construction and maintenance of sophisticated space-based astronomical tools for the study of extrasolar planetary systems. In all these areas a human presence in space, and especially on planetary surfaces, will yield a net scientific benefit over what can plausibly be achieved by autonomous robotic systems. A number of policy implications follow from these conclusions, which are also briefly considered. Key Words: Astrobiology—Space exploration—Human spaceflight. Astrobiology 10, 577–587. An astrobiology that truly meets the challenge of its name cannot remain Earthbound. It requires exploration, and the entire universe beckons —Andrew H. Knoll (2003)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ast.2010.0476

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Opportunities for developing the cosmic perspective on human affairs are likely to increase in the future, especially from proposed human space missions beyond low Earth orbit motivated in part by astrobiological considerations.

    “opportunities for developing this cosmic perspective on human affairs are likely to increase in the future, especially as a result of proposed human space missions beyond low Earth orbit, which, at least in part, will be motivated by astrobiological considerations (Crawford, 2010; ISECG, 2013).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Crawford, I. A.
Affiliations
University of London (GB)
Corresponding author
Crawford, Ian A.
Venue
Astrobiology
Published
2010-08
Volume
10
Issue
6
Pages
577-587
ISSN
  • 1531-1074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8070
OpenAlex
W2042122315
Cited by
16
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
0.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Astrobiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BIROn (Birkbeck, University of London) (submittedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space exploration and regulation
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Planetary Science and Exploration
Keywords
human space exploration, early Earth conditions, near-Earth objects, solar system formation, Mars habitability, outer planet exploration, extrasolar planetary systems, space-based astronomy, space exploration policy
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Physiological, Extraterrestrial Environment, Humans, Space Flight, Moon, Solar System, Mars, Exobiology, Risk Assessment, Geological Phenomena

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review