Cited by 130Stellar, planetary, and galactic studiesSpace Science and Extraterrestrial LifeAstro and Planetary Science

Effects of Extreme Obliquity Variations on the Habitability of Exoplanets

Open access
Armstrong, J.C., Barnes, R., Domagal-Goldman, S., Breiner, J., Quinn, T.R., Meadows, V.S.·2014·Astrobiology

Abstract

We explore the impact of obliquity variations on planetary habitability in hypothetical systems with high mutual inclination. We show that large-amplitude, high-frequency obliquity oscillations on Earth-like exoplanets can suppress the ice-albedo feedback, increasing the outer edge of the habitable zone. We restricted our exploration to hypothetical systems consisting of a solar-mass star, an Earth-mass planet at 1 AU, and 1 or 2 larger planets. We verified that these systems are stable for 10 8 years with N -body simulations and calculated the obliquity variations induced by the orbital evolution of the Earth-mass planet and a torque from the host star. We ran a simplified energy balance model on the terrestrial planet to assess surface temperature and ice coverage on the planet's surface, and we calculated differences in the outer edge of the habitable zone for planets with rapid obliquity variations. For each hypothetical system, we calculated the outer edge of habitability for two conditions: (1) the full evolution of the planetary spin and orbit and (2) the eccentricity and obliquity fixed at their average values. We recovered previous results that higher values of fixed obliquity and eccentricity expand the habitable zone, but we also found that obliquity oscillations further expand habitable orbits in all cases. Terrestrial planets near the outer edge of the habitable zone may be more likely to support life in systems that induce rapid obliquity oscillations as opposed to fixed-spin planets. Such planets may be the easiest to directly characterize with space-borne telescopes. Key Words: Exoplanets—Habitable zone—Energy balance models. Astrobiology 14, 277–291.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ast.2013.1129

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Planets with high obliquities may be habitable farther from their host stars, because this would cause the poles to be hit with large energy fluxes, which would suppress runaway glaciation at the outer edge of the habitable zone.

    “Planets with high obliquities (in other words, planets “turned on their sides”) may be habitable farther from their host stars, because this would cause the poles to be hit with large energy fluxes, which would suppress the runaway glaciation at the outer edge of the habitable zone (Spiegel et al., 2009; Armstrong et al., 2014).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Armstrong et al., 2014

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Exoplanet Biosignatures: A Framework for Their Assessment

    Catling, D. C., Krissansen-Totton, J., Kiang, N. Y., Crisp, D., Robinson, T. D., DasSarma, S., Rushby, A. J., Del Genio, A., Bains, W., & Domagal-Goldman, S. (2018) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2017.1737 · Cited by 225 · see citing works

    Self-citation
  • The Astrobiology Primer v2.0

    Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Adamala, K., Arina de la Rubia, L., Bond, J., Dartnell, L. R., Goldman, A. D., Lynch, K., et al. (2016) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1460 · Cited by 136 · see citing works

    “Planets with high obliquities (in other words, planets ‘‘turned on their sides’’) may be habitable farther from their host stars, because this would cause the poles to be hit with large energy fluxes, which would suppress the runaway glaciation at the outer edge of the habitable zone (Spiegel et al., 2009; Armstrong e…”
    Self-citation

Authors
Armstrong, J. C., Barnes, R., Domagal-Goldman, S., Breiner, J., Quinn, T. R., & Meadows, V. S.
Affiliations
  • Weber State University (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Goddard Space Flight Center (US)
Corresponding author
Armstrong, J.C.
Venue
Astrobiology
Published
2014-04
Volume
14
Issue
4
Pages
277-291
ISSN
  • 1531-1074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8070
OpenAlex
W2015270436
Cited by
130
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 35 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2
FWCI
4.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Astrobiology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Astro and Planetary Science
Keywords
obliquity variations, exoplanet habitability, habitable zone, ice-albedo feedback, mutual inclination, orbital evolution, tidal torque, energy balance model, ice cover, surface temperature, Earth-like exoplanets, orbital stability
MeSH terms
Climate, Energy Transfer, Models, Theoretical, Planets, Exobiology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review