On the Rate of Abiogenesis from a Bayesian Informatics Perspective
Open accessAbstract
Life appears to have emerged relatively quickly on the Earth, a fact sometimes used to justify a high rate of spontaneous abiogenesis ( λ ) among Earth-like worlds. Conditioned upon a single datum—the time of earliest evidence for life ( t obs )—previous Bayesian formalisms for the posterior distribution of λ have demonstrated how inferences are highly sensitive to the priors. Rather than attempt to infer the true λ posterior, we here compute the relative change to λ when new experimental/observational evidence is introduced. By simulating posterior distributions and resulting entropic information gains, we compare three experimental pressures on λ : (1) evidence for an earlier start to life, t obs , (2) constraints on spontaneous abiogenesis from the laboratory, and (3) an exoplanet survey for biosignatures. First, we find that experiments 1 and 2 can only yield lower limits on λ , unlike 3. Second, evidence for an earlier start to life can yield negligible information on λ if \documentclass{aastex}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{bm}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{pifont}\usepackage{stmaryrd}\usepackage{textcomp}\usepackage{portland, xspace}\usepackage{amsmath, amsxtra}\usepackage{upgreek}\pagestyle{empty}\DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6}\begin{document}$${t_{{ \rm{obs}}}} \ll \lambda _{ \max }^{ - 1}$$ \end{document} . Vice versa, experiment 2 is uninformative when \documentclass{aastex}\usepackage{amsbsy}\usepackage{amsfonts}\usepackage{amssymb}\usepackage{bm}\usepackage{mathrsfs}\usepackage{pifont}\usepackage{stmaryrd}\usepackage{textcomp}\usepackage{portland, xspace}\usepackage{amsmath, amsxtra}\usepackage{upgreek}\pagestyle{empty}\DeclareMathSizes{10}{9}{7}{6}\begin{document}$${ \lambda _{{ \rm{max}}}} \gg t_{{ \rm{obs}}}^{ - 1}$$ \end{document} . While experiment 3 appears the most direct means of measuring λ , we highlight that early starts inform us of the conditions of abiogenesis and that laboratory experiments could succeed in building new life. Altogether, the three experiments are complementary, and we encourage activity in all to solve this grand challenge.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
An arbitrarily low abiogenesis rate cannot be robustly excluded because the chance probability tab/t⊕ ~ 0.1 is not negligible assuming a constant abiogenesis rate.
“but an arbitrarily low rate cannot be robustly excluded25–27 because the chance probability tab∕t⊕ ~ 0.1 is not negligible assuming a constant abiogenesis rate, where tab is the time of abiogenesis elapsed from the birth of Earth28, and t⊕ the present age of Earth.”
From Emergence of life in an inflationary universe (2020) · cites this paper as [27]
Cites
Asymptotic Theory of Certain "Goodness of Fit" Criteria Based on Stochastic Processes
Anderson, T. W., & Darling, D. A. (1952) · The Annals of Mathematical Statistics · doi:10.1214/aoms/1177729437 · Cited by 3,542 · see citing works
Wilde, S. A., Valley, J. W., Peck, W. H., & Graham, C. M. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051550 · Cited by 1,744 · see citing works
One or more bound planets per Milky Way star from microlensing observations
Cassan, A., Kubas, D., Beaulieu, J.-P., Dominik, M., Horne, K., Greenhill, J., Wambsganss, J., Menzies, J., Williams, A., Jørgensen, U. G., et al. (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10684 · Cited by 584 · see citing works
Evidence of Archean life: Stromatolites and microfossils
Schopf, J. W., Kudryavtsev, A. B., Czaja, A. D., & Tripathi, A. B. (2007) · Precambrian Research · doi:10.1016/j.precamres.2007.04.009 · Cited by 409 · see citing works
The anthropic principle and its implications for biological evolution
Carter, B. (1983) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.1983.0096 · Cited by 375 · cited 1× · see citing works
“From this observation, there have been numerous efforts to quantify k conditioned upon this datum, with, for example, Carter (1983) concluding that it is compatible with life being rare, whereas the findings of Line-weaver and Davis (2002) point strongly toward life being common on Earth-like worlds.”
Bayesian analysis of the astrobiological implications of life’s early emergence on Earth
Spiegel, D. S., & Turner, E. L. (2012) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1111694108 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Emergence of life in an inflationary universe
Totani, T. (2020) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-020-58060-0 · Cited by 29 · see citing works
- Authors
- Chen, J., & Kipping, D.
- Affiliations
- Columbia University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Chen, Jingjing
- Venue
- Astrobiology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-11-29
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1574-1584
- ISSN
- 1531-1074 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8070
- OpenAlex
- W2809297365
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 1.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Locations
- Astrobiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Origins and Evolution of Life
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Earth Systems and Cosmic Evolution
- Keywords
- origin of life, Bayesian inference, prior distributions, information gain, exoplanet biosignatures, exoplanet habitability
- MeSH terms
- Origin of Life, Bayes Theorem, Extraterrestrial Environment, Planets, Exobiology
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review