The lived experience of autistic adults in employment: a systematic search and synthesis
Open accessAbstract
Background: Employment is a critical factor contributing to the well-being and quality of life of autistic people of working age. Historically, research has tended to focus on interventions and employment-related outcomes, typically generated without the input of autistic workers. Interventions often work to help the autistic worker fit into the working environment rather than it being adjusted for the autistic worker. However, a growing body of research reflects autistic workers' experiences of employment with consideration given to how the workplace should change to reflect the differences of this historically marginalized group. Methods: This study is a systematic analysis of existing research that focuses on and prioritizes autistic workers' experiences of employment. Our analysis draws on the social relational model of disability (SRMD), an approach increasingly applied in contexts of autism and employment. We systematically searched five journal databases, resulting in 34 articles that reflect the lived experience of autistic people in employment. Results: . The results draw on the SRMD, revealing nuances to inclusionary and exclusionary employment for the autistic workforce. Conclusion: Our findings encourage the prioritization of the voice of autistic workers when designing working environments. They also function as a critique of the traditional approaches that placed employers, managers, and human resource professionals as the dominant agents of decision-making. In these traditional practices, the burden of making employment viable was on the worker, rather than the employer. The results of this study framed through the SRMD allowed for enhanced understanding of the barriers and new insights into how to improve the employment experience for autistic adults.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Employees with ASD can prefer to work in settings outside of the traditional workplace.
“In particular, employees with ASD, who may find 'small talk', reading body language and understanding social cues to be challenging, can prefer to work in settings outside of the traditional workplace [8].”
From Homeworking experiences of neuro-divergent workers: systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 72 · Cited by 43
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Thomas C. Female Forms: Experiencing and Under- standing Disability. Disability, Human Rights and Society. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1999.
- Bross LA, Patry MB, Leko M, Travers JC. Barriers to competitive integrated employment of young adults with autism spectrum disorder. Educ Train Autism Dev Disabil. 2021;56(4):394-408.
- Gemma N. Reconceptualising 'reasonable adjustments' for the successful employment of autistic women. Disabil Soc. 2021;38(6):1-19.
- Authors
- Thorpe, D., McKinlay, M., Richards, J., Sang, K., & Stewart, M. E.
- Affiliations
- Heriot-Watt University (GB)
- University of Stirling (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Thorpe, David
- Venue
- Autism in Adulthood
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2024-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 495-509
- ISSN
- 2573-9581 (ISSN-L)
- 2573-959X
- PMC
- PMC11861060
- OpenAlex
- W4390661920
- Cited by
- 43
- References
- 72
- Citations by year
- 2026: 21 · 2025: 15 · 2024: 7
- FWCI
- 3.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Autism in Adulthood (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Disability Education and Employment
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Employment and Welfare Studies
- Keywords
- autism spectrum disorder, autistic adults, employment, lived experience, social relational model of disability, workplace inclusion, workplace exclusion, barriers to employment, employer responsibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review