Cited by 2Attachment and Relationship DynamicsAutism Spectrum Disorder ResearchFamily and Disability Support Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 7 of the 7 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Relationship Satisfaction Among Autistic Populations: How Partner Neurotype Influences Relationship Satisfaction Factors for Autistic Adults

Open access
Khaw, Jessica, Vernon, Ty·2026·Autism in Adulthood

Abstract

Background: Autistic individuals report high levels of interest in pursuing and maintaining romantic relationships but indicate fewer and less satisfying relationships when compared with non-autistic populations. In this mixed-methods study, we investigated the self-identified factors that contribute to successful romantic relationships for autistic adults with the additional goal of understanding if and how their partners’ neurotypes may influence relationship satisfaction. Methods: We compared levels of relationship satisfaction among 106 autistic individuals by categorizing each participant into one of three groups based on the specific neurotype of their partner: (1) autistic/autistic (A/A) dyads; (2) autistic/neurotypical (A/NT) dyads; and (3) autistic/non-autistic but neurodivergent (A/ND) dyads. All participants completed a series of online surveys to gather information about their autistic traits, overall relationship satisfaction, reciprocal communication and support, and perceived impact of autism on relationships. Results: Across the three dyads, participants reported similar levels of relationship satisfaction, and we found no statistically significant differences when comparing the mean satisfaction of each sample group. Participants indicated a wide variety of positive and negative relational aspects, with a few themes changing in frequency based on partner neurotype. Participants with autistic partners tended to focus on an inherent and deep sense of understanding when discussing the positive aspects of their relationships, while those with non-autistic partners were more likely to discuss the presence of mutual support and accommodation. In addition to some differences in reported themes, participants tended to report that their autistic traits positively impacted satisfaction in A/A dyads, while those in A/NT and A/ND dyads tended to report that their autistic traits posed challenges in their relationships. Conclusions: The results of this study indicate that the neurotype of an autistic individual’s partner may influence some of the reported positive and challenging aspects of their relationships. However, survey results indicate that autistic populations generally find comparable levels of satisfaction in romantic relationships irrespective of neurotype, which suggests that while partner neurotype may shape the enabling and barring factors for relationship success, it does not directly affect the overall health of a relationship. Finally, how an autistic individual perceives the impact of autism on their relationship may be affected by the neurotype of their partner. Community Brief: Why is this an important issue?: Many autistic folks seek out and thrive in romantic relationships, but studies report that autistic people experience lower relationship satisfaction than non-autistic people. Despite this, the autism research field has made little progress toward understanding (a) why this is the case and (b) how we can better support autistic individuals who are navigating romantic relationships. To best understand what autistic people seek in relationships, we created a space where autistic participants could share their experiences without comparison with those of non-autistic people. What was the purpose of this study?: We contributed to the current body of literature by learning more about what autistic people seek in relationships. We also wanted to see what they may struggle with and if these factors are influenced by whether their partner is neurotypical (referring to someone whose brain works in a way that is socially “typical”), neurodivergent (broadly referring to someone whose brain works differently from what is considered “typical”), and/or autistic. In doing this, we hope to help develop more effective ways of supporting autistic individuals who seek romantic connections. What did the researchers do?: The lead researcher, J.K., developed the project based on her experiences navigating romantic relationships as an autistic person. She recruited 106 autistic participants to complete a series of surveys regarding relationship satisfaction. Then, participants completed free-response questions about the most positive and negative parts of those relationships. She asked how they felt autism affected their relationships and gathered these components to identify what increased and decreased relationship satisfaction. What were the results of the study?: We found that autistic people are similarly satisfied in their relationships regardless of whether their partners are autistic or not. Despite this, participants consistently identified different positive and challenging factors within their relationships that tended to align with the neurotype of their partners. We found an interesting link between how autistic people view positive and negative factors in successful romantic relationships and their partners’ neurotypes. What do these findings add to what was already known?: We added to a broad body of knowledge about relationship satisfaction by including a greater, more detailed consideration of autistic adults. Instead of comparing survey responses between autistic and non-autistic participants, we compared how autistic people viewed relationship satisfaction based on if their partners were autistic, non-autistic but still neurodivergent, or neurotypical. What are potential weaknesses in the study?: Potential limitations include the following: (1) we recruited a low number of male-identified participants, (2) we did not collect co-occurring diagnoses and conditions from the autistic participants, and (3) we did not verify partner neurotype. How will these findings help autistic adults now or in the future?: Through this project, we were able to highlight positive communication and interpersonal skills among autistic adults. We hope that the results of this study will help autistic people and their partners find some peace and community by reading about others with similar relationship experiences. We also hope to help them further understand what factors might serve as potential strengths and weaknesses in their relationships.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/aut.2024.0124

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 7 references

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. 10.1111/pere.12397 · DOI
  2. 10.1002/jclp.22319 · DOI
  3. 10.1007/s11195-019-09573-8 · DOI
  4. 10.1016/j.comppsych.2013.08.001 · DOI
  5. 10.1007/bf02172209 · DOI
  6. 10.1023/b:jadd.0000029547.96610.df · DOI
  7. 10.1007/s10803-013-1833-8 · DOI · Paper page
  8. 10.1007/s10803-006-0344-2 · DOI
  9. 10.1016/j.paid.2018.02.028 · DOI
  10. 10.1007/s10803-022-05659-z · DOI
  11. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.001 · DOI
  12. 10.1080/14330237.2018.1435041 · DOI
  13. 10.1007/s10902-005-1755-z · DOI · Paper page
  14. 10.1177/0265407505056438 · DOI
  15. 10.1177/13623613221117914 · DOI
  16. 10.1177/0734282913517525 · DOI
  17. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.980 · DOI
  18. 10.1177/0265407598151009 · DOI
  19. Xu M, , Fralick D, , Zheng JZ, , Wang B, , Tu XM, , Feng C. The differences and similarities between two-sample t-test and paired t-test. Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2017; 29(3):184–188; doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217070 · DOI
  20. 10.4324/9780203771587 · DOI · Paper page
  21. 10.1007/978-1-4419-9863-7_1213 · DOI
  22. 10.1177/0146167209342754 · DOI
  23. 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · DOI · Paper page
  24. 10.1037/a0019481 · DOI
  25. 10.1080/09687599.2020.1822782 · DOI · Paper page
  26. 10.1007/s10591-006-9010-2 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Khaw, J., & Vernon, T.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Barbara (US)
Corresponding author
Khaw, Jessica
Venue
Autism in Adulthood
Published
2025-01-15
Volume
8
Issue
4
Pages
720-734
ISSN
  • 2573-9581 (ISSN-L)
  • 2573-959X
OpenAlex
W4406421085
Cited by
2
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Autism in Adulthood (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
University of California, Santa Barbara
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Family and Disability Support Research
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, romantic relationships, relationship satisfaction, autistic adults, reciprocal communication

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review