Cited by 12Ethics in Clinical ResearchBiomedical Ethics and RegulationBiotechnology and Related Fields

Practical approach to biobanking in Zimbabwe: Establishment of an inclusive stakeholder framework

Matimba, Alice, Tybring, Gunnel, Chitereka, Jekoniya, Zinyama-Gutsire, Rutendo, Dandara, Collet, Bürén, Eva, Dhoro, Milcah, Masimirembwa, Collen·2016·Biopreservation and Biobanking

Abstract

The growing need for biobanks in health research presents an opportunity for building capacity in developing countries. In Zimbabwe, there is limited knowledge and awareness about biobanking. As such we report the proceedings of a biobanking course, which included research scientists, healthcare professionals, and regulatory authorities as a start to developing a framework for biobanking practice. The aim was to educate stakeholders about biobanking and to understand the current and future regulatory and infrastructure requirements for biobanking. Using an inclusive stakeholder approach, we sought to articulate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. This report highlights a practical method to providing basic education to stakeholders, building awareness and consensus about building capacity for biobanking in a developing country.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/bio.2015.0043

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • H3Africa has shown that with proper logistics and funding, world-class genomic QC for producing high-quality biological samples is achievable in places like Nigeria and Zimbabwe, democratizing both participation and benefits.

    “Initiatives like Human Heredity and Health in Africa (H3Africa) have shown that with proper logistics and funding, world-class genomic QC for producing high-quality biological samples is achievable in places like Nigeria and Zimbabwe, democratizing both participation and benefits [152,153].”

Cited by

Authors
Matimba, A., Tybring, G., Chitereka, J., Zinyama-Gutsire, R., Dandara, C., Bürén, E., Dhoro, M., & Masimirembwa, C.
Affiliations
  • University of Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • Karolinska Institutet (SE)
  • Research Council of Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe (ZW)
  • University of Cape Town (ZA)
  • African Institute of Biomedical Science and Technology (ZW)
Corresponding author
Matimba, Alice
Venue
Biopreservation and Biobanking
Published
2016-10
Volume
14
Issue
5
Pages
440-446
ISSN
  • 1947-5535 (ISSN-L)
  • 1947-5543
OpenAlex
W2415635094
Cited by
12
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Biopreservation and Biobanking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Biotechnology and Related Fields
Keywords
biobanking, stakeholder engagement, capacity building, developing countries, Zimbabwe, health research, awareness raising
MeSH terms
Health Personnel, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Politics, Specimen Handling, Zimbabwe, Biological Specimen Banks, Biomedical Research

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review