Practical approach to biobanking in Zimbabwe: Establishment of an inclusive stakeholder framework
Abstract
The growing need for biobanks in health research presents an opportunity for building capacity in developing countries. In Zimbabwe, there is limited knowledge and awareness about biobanking. As such we report the proceedings of a biobanking course, which included research scientists, healthcare professionals, and regulatory authorities as a start to developing a framework for biobanking practice. The aim was to educate stakeholders about biobanking and to understand the current and future regulatory and infrastructure requirements for biobanking. Using an inclusive stakeholder approach, we sought to articulate the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats. This report highlights a practical method to providing basic education to stakeholders, building awareness and consensus about building capacity for biobanking in a developing country.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
H3Africa has shown that with proper logistics and funding, world-class genomic QC for producing high-quality biological samples is achievable in places like Nigeria and Zimbabwe, democratizing both participation and benefits.
“Initiatives like Human Heredity and Health in Africa (H3Africa) have shown that with proper logistics and funding, world-class genomic QC for producing high-quality biological samples is achievable in places like Nigeria and Zimbabwe, democratizing both participation and benefits [152,153].”
From Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review (2026) · cites this paper as [152]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Genetic Insights into the Economic Toll of Cell Line Misidentification: A Comprehensive Review
Weiskirchen, R. (2026) · Medical Sciences · doi:10.3390/medsci14010025 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
- Authors
- Matimba, A., Tybring, G., Chitereka, J., Zinyama-Gutsire, R., Dandara, C., Bürén, E., Dhoro, M., & Masimirembwa, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Zimbabwe (ZW)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Research Council of Zimbabwe (ZW)
- Medical Research Council of Zimbabwe (ZW)
- University of Cape Town (ZA)
- African Institute of Biomedical Science and Technology (ZW)
- Corresponding author
- Matimba, Alice
- Venue
- Biopreservation and Biobanking
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 440-446
- ISSN
- 1947-5535 (ISSN-L)
- 1947-5543
- OpenAlex
- W2415635094
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 0.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Biopreservation and Biobanking (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Medical Research Council
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics in Clinical Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Biomedical Ethics and Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Biotechnology and Related Fields
- Keywords
- biobanking, stakeholder engagement, capacity building, developing countries, Zimbabwe, health research, awareness raising
- MeSH terms
- Health Personnel, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Politics, Specimen Handling, Zimbabwe, Biological Specimen Banks, Biomedical Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review