Long-Term Administration of Intranasal Oxytocin Is a Safe and Promising Therapy for Early Adolescent Boys with Autism Spectrum Disorders
Abstract
Objective: Oxytocin (OT) has been a candidate for the treatment of autism spectrum disorders (ASD), and the impact of intranasally delivered OT on ASD has been investigated. However, most previous studies were conducted by single-dose administration to adults; and, therefore, the long-term effect of nasal OT on ASD patients and its effect on children remain to be clarified. Methods: We conducted a singled-armed, open-label study in which OT was administered intranasally over the long term to eight male youth with ASD (10–14 years of age; intelligence quotient [IQ] 20–101). The OT administration was performed in a stepwise increased dosage manner every 2 months (8, 16, 24 IU/dose). A placebo period (1–2 weeks) was inserted before each step. The outcome measures were Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule – Generic (ADOS-G), Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL), and the Aberrant Behavior Checklist (ABC). In addition, side effects were monitored by measuring blood pressure and examining urine and blood samples. Results: Six of the eight participants showed improved scores on the communication and social interaction domains of the ADOS-G. However, regarding the T-scores of the CBCL and the scores of the ABC, we could not find any statistically significant improvement, although several subcategories showed a mild tendency for improvement. Caregivers of five of the eight participants reported certain positive effects of the OT therapy, especially on the quality of reciprocal communication. All participants showed excellent compliance and no side effects. Conclusions: Although our results on the efficacy of long-term nasal OT therapy still remain controversial, to the best of our knowledge, this is the first report documenting the safety of long-term nasal OT therapy for children with ASD. Even though our data are too preliminary to draw any definite conclusions about efficacy, they do suggest this therapy to be safe, promising, and worthy of a large-scale, double-blind placebo-controlled study.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Human studies have prevalently used acute administration of OXT in healthy subjects, whereas prolonged OXT treatments have been adopted only in pathological states presenting social deficits.
“human studies have prevalently used acute administration of OXT in healthy subjects”
From Chronic and acute intranasal oxytocin produce divergent social effects in mice (2014) · cites this paper as Tachibana et al, 2013
Chronic intake of IN-OT in young males with ASD is safe.
“Researchers also investigated the effects of chronic intake of IN-OT in young males with ASD and found that it is safe and showed some improvements in clinical scores (Tachibana et al. 2013), but not in other measures such as the child behavioral checklist.”
From A precision medicine approach to oxytocin trials (2017) · cites this paper as Tachibana et al. 2013
Chronic intake of IN-OT in young males with ASD showed some improvements in clinical scores.
“Researchers also investigated the effects of chronic intake of IN-OT in young males with ASD and found that it is safe and showed some improvements in clinical scores (Tachibana et al. 2013), but not in other measures such as the child behavioral checklist.”
From A precision medicine approach to oxytocin trials (2017) · cites this paper as Tachibana et al. 2013
Chronic intake of IN-OT in young males with ASD did not improve other measures such as the child behavioral checklist.
“Researchers also investigated the effects of chronic intake of IN-OT in young males with ASD and found that it is safe and showed some improvements in clinical scores (Tachibana et al. 2013), but not in other measures such as the child behavioral checklist.”
From A precision medicine approach to oxytocin trials (2017) · cites this paper as Tachibana et al. 2013
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 151
- Authors
- Tachibana, M., Kagitani-Shimono, K., Mohri, I., Yamamoto, T., Sanefuji, W., Nakamura, A., Oishi, M., Kimura, T., Onaka, T., Ozono, K., & Taniike, M.
- Affiliations
- Molecular Research Center for Children's Mental Development (JP)
- Osaka University
- Osaka University Hospital (JP)
- The University of Osaka (JP)
- Jichi Medical University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Oishi, Masako
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2013-03
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 123-127
- ISSN
- 1044-5463 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8992
- OpenAlex
- W2092758385
- Semantic Scholar
- 2cfdfca885fa344418eb3189e7ba537ea909766e
- Cited by
- 151
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 25 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 32.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Child and Adolescent Psychopharmacology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
- Keywords
- oxytocin, autism spectrum disorder, intranasal administration, long-term treatment, adolescent boys, treatment safety, social communication, reciprocal communication, aberrant behavior, Child Behavior Checklist, Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule
- MeSH terms
- Administration, Intranasal, Adolescent, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Humans, Male, Oxytocin, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Medication Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review