The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure Using Structured Neural Networks and Multiple Sequence Alignments
Abstract
The prediction of protein secondary structure by use of carefully structured neural networks and multiple sequence alignments has been investigated. Separate networks are used for predicting the three secondary structures alpha-helix, beta-strand, and coil. The networks are designed using a priori knowledge of amino acid properties with respect to the secondary structure and the characteristic periodicity in alpha-helices. Since these single-structure networks all have less than 600 adjustable weights, overfitting is avoided. To obtain a three-state prediction of alpha-helix, beta-strand, or coil, ensembles of single-structure networks are combined with another neural network. This method gives an overall prediction accuracy of 66.3% when using 7-fold cross-validation on a database of 126 nonhomologous globular proteins. Applying the method to multiple sequence alignments of homologous proteins increases the prediction accuracy significantly to 71.3% with corresponding Matthew's correlation coefficients C alpha = 0.59, C beta = 0.52, and Cc = 0.50. More than 72% of the residues in the database are predicted with an accuracy of 80%. It is shown that the network outputs can be interpreted as estimated probabilities of correct prediction, and, therefore, these numbers indicate which residues are predicted with high confidence.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Backpropagation Applied to Handwritten Zip Code Recognition
LeCun, Y., Boser, B., Denker, J. S., Henderson, D., Howard, R. E., Hubbard, W., & Jackel, L. D. (1989) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1989.1.4.541 · Cited by 11,891
Wolpert, D. H. (1992) · Neural Networks · doi:10.1016/s0893-6080(05)80023-1 · Cited by 7,951
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399 · cited 1×
“A complementary measure of prediction accuracy is obtained from the Matthews' correlation coefficients (Matthews, 1975) for each of the three secondary structures: Ca, Cß, and Cc.”
Hansen, L. K., & Salamon, P. (1990) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/34.58871 · Cited by 4,260
Cited by
Deep learning in biomedical data science
Baldi, P. (2018) · Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-biodatasci-080917-013343 · Cited by 119
Amino acid encoding methods for protein sequences: a comprehensive review and assessment
Jing, X., Dong, Q., Hong, D., & Lu, R. (2020) · IEEE/ACM Transactions on Computational Biology and Bioinformatics · doi:10.1109/tcbb.2019.2911677 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- RIIS, S. K., & KROGH, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Computational Biology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1996-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 163-183
- ISSN
- 1066-5277 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8666
- OpenAlex
- W1966849089
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 1.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure Using Structured Neural Networks and Multiple Sequence Alignments. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/cmb.1996.3.163
- The paper
- RIIS, S. K., & KROGH, A. (1996). Improving Prediction of Protein Secondary Structure Using Structured Neural Networks and Multiple Sequence Alignments. Journal of Computational Biology. https://doi.org/10.1089/cmb.1996.3.163
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.