Cited by 21Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesAlgorithms and Data CompressionFractal and DNA sequence analysis

Multiple sequence alignment based on a suffix tree and center-star strategy: A linear method for multiple nucleotide sequence alignment on spark parallel framework

Su, Wenhe, Liao, Xiangke, Lu, Yutong, Zou, Quan, Peng, Shaoliang·2017·Journal of Computational Biology

Abstract

Multiple sequence alignment (MSA) is an essential prerequisite and dominant method to deduce the biological facts from a set of molecular biological sequences. It refers to a series of algorithmic solutions for the alignment of evolutionarily related sequences while taking into account evolutionary events such as mutations, insertions, deletions, and rearrangements under certain conditions. These methods can be applied to DNA, RNA, or protein sequences. In this work, we take advantage of a center-star strategy to reduce the MSA problem to pairwise alignments, and we use a suffix tree to match identical substrings between two pairwise sequences. Multiple sequence alignment based on a suffix tree and center-star strategy (MASC) can accomplish MSA in O(mn), which is linear time complexity, where m is the number of sequences and n is the average length of sequences. Furthermore, we execute our method on the Spark-distributed parallel framework to deal with ever-increasing massive data sets. Our method is significantly faster than previous techniques, with no loss in accuracy for highly similar nucleotide sequences like homologous sequences, which we experimentally demonstrate. Comparing with mainstream MSA tools (e.g., MAFFT), MASC could finish the alignment of 67,200 sequences, longer than 10,000 bps, in 9 minutes, which takes MAFFT >3.5 days.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cmb.2017.0040

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The multiple sequence alignment algorithm can perform an alignment of 67,200 strains, all longer than 10,000 bps, in 9 minutes.

    “This algorithm can perform an alignment of 67,200 strains, all longer than 10,000 bps, in 9 min”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Su, W., Liao, X., Lu, Y., Zou, Q., & Peng, S.
Affiliations
  • National University of Defense Technology (CN)
  • Tianjin University (CN)
  • Hunan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Zou, Quan
  • Peng, Shaoliang
Venue
Journal of Computational Biology
Published
2017-12
Volume
24
Issue
12
Pages
1230-1242
ISSN
  • 1066-5277 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8666
OpenAlex
W2768022300
Cited by
21
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5
FWCI
0.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Computational Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Algorithms and Data Compression
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fractal and DNA sequence analysis
Keywords
multiple sequence alignment, suffix trees, nucleotide sequence, linear time complexity, Spark, distributed computing, pairwise sequence alignment, homologous sequences, large-scale sequence data
MeSH terms
Algorithms, DNA, Humans, Proteins, RNA, Software, Sequence Alignment, Computational Biology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review