Cited by 134Impact of Technology on AdolescentsDigital Mental Health InterventionsAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

Mobile Phone Use, Emotion Regulation, and Well-Being

Hoffner, Cynthia A., Lee, Sangmi·2015·Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking

Abstract

This study examined the use of mobile phones to regulate negative emotions, considering both the role of different aspects of phone use and individual differences in emotion regulation strategies. A total of 287 young adult smartphone users completed an online survey that addressed use of mobile phones for negative emotion regulation. They responded to a phone loss scenario by rating how much they would miss various uses/functions of the phone (which could be involved in emotion regulation). Habitual use of reappraisal to regulate emotion was associated with missing both interpersonal contact and social support, but not access to entertainment/information. In contrast, habitual use of emotion suppression was associated only with missing entertainment/information content. Regulating negative emotions via mobile phone was associated with missing all three uses/functions of the phone, but perception that the phone was effective in remediating negative emotion was associated only with missing social support. Well-being was related to greater use and perceived effectiveness of the mobile phone for emotion regulation. Overall, this study demonstrates that mobile phones can yield psychological benefits, depending on how they are used. Findings suggest that using the phone for social support is most likely to lead to effective remediation of negative emotion. Interpretations and implications of the findings are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2014.0487

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 134

Authors
Hoffner, C. A., & Lee, S.
Affiliations
Georgia State University (US)
Venue
Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
Published
2015-07
Volume
18
Issue
7
Pages
411-416
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2294593061
Cited by
134
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
FWCI
21.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
mobile phone use, emotion regulation, negative emotions, well-being, cognitive reappraisal, emotional suppression, smartphone users, social support, interpersonal contact, young adults
MeSH terms
Adult, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Social Support, Cell Phone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review