Mobile Phone Use, Emotion Regulation, and Well-Being
Abstract
This study examined the use of mobile phones to regulate negative emotions, considering both the role of different aspects of phone use and individual differences in emotion regulation strategies. A total of 287 young adult smartphone users completed an online survey that addressed use of mobile phones for negative emotion regulation. They responded to a phone loss scenario by rating how much they would miss various uses/functions of the phone (which could be involved in emotion regulation). Habitual use of reappraisal to regulate emotion was associated with missing both interpersonal contact and social support, but not access to entertainment/information. In contrast, habitual use of emotion suppression was associated only with missing entertainment/information content. Regulating negative emotions via mobile phone was associated with missing all three uses/functions of the phone, but perception that the phone was effective in remediating negative emotion was associated only with missing social support. Well-being was related to greater use and perceived effectiveness of the mobile phone for emotion regulation. Overall, this study demonstrates that mobile phones can yield psychological benefits, depending on how they are used. Findings suggest that using the phone for social support is most likely to lead to effective remediation of negative emotion. Interpretations and implications of the findings are discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
People with deficits in emotion regulation are more likely to have increased time on PSU and negative psychological health outcomes.
“Early studies have supported that people with defect in emotion regulation are more likely to have the increasing time on PSU [12] and the negative psychological health outcomes (e.g., stress, anxiety, etc.) [2,13].”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 34 · Cited by 134
- Authors
- Hoffner, C. A., & Lee, S.
- Affiliations
- Georgia State University (US)
- Venue
- Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-07
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 411-416
- ISSN
- 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
- 2152-2723
- OpenAlex
- W2294593061
- Cited by
- 134
- References
- 34
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3
- FWCI
- 21.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
- Keywords
- mobile phone use, emotion regulation, negative emotions, well-being, cognitive reappraisal, emotional suppression, smartphone users, social support, interpersonal contact, young adults
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Emotions, Female, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Personal Satisfaction, Social Support, Cell Phone, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review