Cited by 34Bullying, Victimization, and AggressionImpact of Technology on AdolescentsHate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection

The protective role of dispositional mindfulness against the perpetuation of cyberbullying victimization and perpetration among adolescents

Royuela-Colomer, Estíbaliz, Calvete, Esther, Gámez-Guadix, Manuel, Orue, Izaskun·2018·Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking

Abstract

Few studies have examined the protective factors that contribute to reducing long-term involvement in cyberbullying (CB). This study examined whether dispositional mindfulness is associated with the reduced stability over time (i.e., long-term involvement) of CB victimization and perpetration and with the lower reciprocity of both. This was a three-wave longitudinal study spaced 6 months apart. The sample consisted of 985 high school students from the Basque Country (Spain). The participants completed a mindfulness measure at time one and measures of CB victimization and perpetration at three time points. Dispositional mindfulness was negatively associated with both CB victimization and CB perpetration over time. The predictive association between CB victimization and perpetration was reciprocal from time two to time three. Moreover, the interaction between dispositional mindfulness and CB victimization indicated that victimization was less stable over time when mindfulness was higher. The model was invariant across gender or age. The results indicate that CB is a long-term problem and that dispositional mindfulness can be beneficial because it predicts a lower frequency of CB victimization and perpetration over time.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/cyber.2017.0685

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 50 · Cited by 34

Authors
Royuela-Colomer, E., Calvete, E., Gámez-Guadix, M., & Orue, I.
Affiliations
  • Universidad de Deusto (ES)
  • Department of Biological and Health Psychology, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
Corresponding author
Calvete, Esther
Venue
Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking
Published
2018-11
Volume
21
Issue
11
Pages
703-710
ISSN
  • 2152-2715 (ISSN-L)
  • 2152-2723
OpenAlex
W2901250991
Cited by
34
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cyberpsychology Behavior and Social Networking (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection
Keywords
trait mindfulness, cyberbullying, cyber victimization, cyberbullying perpetration, adolescents, reciprocal effects, longitudinal stability, protective factors, high school students
MeSH terms
Cyberbullying, Adolescent, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Spain, Students, Time Factors, Crime Victims, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review