Cited by 65Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Associations of nutrient intake with glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes: differences by insulin regimen

Open access
Katz, Michelle L., Mehta, Sanjeev, Nansel, Tonja, Quinn, Heidi, Lipsky, Leah M., Laffel, Lori M.B.·2014·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Type 1 diabetes management has evolved from meal plans towards flexible eating with carbohydrate counting. With this shift, youth with type 1 diabetes may consume excess fat and insufficient fiber, which may impact glycemic control. Few studies consider whether insulin regimen influences associations between dietary intake and hemoglobin A1c. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 252 youth (52% male; age, 13.2 ± 2.8 years; body mass index z-score [z-BMI], 0.7 ± 0.8) with type 1 diabetes completed 3-day food records. Dietary intake was compared with published guidelines. Logistic regression predicted the odds of suboptimal glycemic control (an A1c level of ≥ 8.5%) related to fat and protein intake or fiber intake according to insulin regimen (pump vs. injection) adjusting for age, sex, diabetes duration, z-BMI, insulin dose, glucose monitoring frequency, and total energy intake (TEI). RESULTS: Youth had a mean TEI of 40.9 ± 15.4 kcal/kg/day and excess fat and insufficient fiber intake compared against published guidelines. Pump-treated youth consuming the highest quartile of fat intake (as percentage TEI) had 3.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.3-9.7) times the odds of a suboptimal A1c than those in the lowest quartile. No such association was found in injection-treated youth. In the total sample, youth with the lowest quartile of fiber intake had 3.6 (95% confidence interval, 1.4-9.0) times the odds of a suboptimal A1c, but this association did not differ by insulin regimen. There was no association between protein intake and A1c. CONCLUSIONS: Higher fat intake in pump-treated youth and lower fiber intake in all youth were associated with an A1c level of ≥ 8.5%. Improving dietary quality may help improve A1c.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2013.0389

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 23 · Cited by 65

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [10]Bantle JP, Wylie-Rosett J, Albright AL, Apovian CM, Clark NG, Franz MJ, Hoogwerf BJ, Lichtenstein AH, Mayer-Davis E, Mooradian AD, Wheeler ML: Nutrition recommendations and interventions for diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2008;31(Suppl 1):S61–S78 [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  2. [11]Institute of Medicine: Dietary Reference Intakes: The Essential Guide to Nutrient Requirements. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press, 2006 [Google Scholar]

Authors
Katz, M. L., Mehta, S., Nansel, T., Quinn, H., Lipsky, L. M., & Laffel, L. M. B.
Affiliations
  • Joslin Diabetes Center (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
Laffel, Lori M.B.
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2014-08
Volume
16
Issue
8
Pages
512-518
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W1996009497
Cited by
65
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
3.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Joslin Diabetes Center (P30DK036836)
  • National Institutes of Health (HHSN267200703434C)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (T32 #5T32DK007260-35, K12DK094721, T32DK007260, P30DK036836)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN267200703434C)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (HHSN267200703434C)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, youth, glycemic control, HbA1c, dietary fat intake, dietary fiber intake, protein intake, insulin pump therapy, insulin injection, carbohydrate counting, diet quality
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Attitude to Health, Blood Glucose, Cross-Sectional Studies, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diet, Dietary Carbohydrates, Dietary Fats, Dietary Fiber, Feeding Behavior, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Diet Records, Body Mass Index

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review