Cited by 35Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationPatient Safety and Medication Errors

Accuracy of Blood Glucose Meters for Self-Monitoring Affects Glucose Control and Hypoglycemia Rate in Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes

Boettcher, Claudia, Dost, Axel, Wudy, Stefan A., Flechtner-Mors, Marion, Borkenstein, Martin, Schiel, Ralf, Weitzel, Dieter, Bechtold-Dalla Pozza, Susanne +3 more·2015·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Aims/Hypothesis: This study investigated the accuracy of blood glucose meters for self-monitoring and its influence on glycated hemoglobin (HbA 1c ) levels and the frequency of hypoglycemic coma. Materials and Methods: Self-measured and simultaneously obtained laboratory blood glucose values from 9,163 patients with type 1 diabetes <18 years of age in the German/Austrian Diabetes Prospective Documentation Initiative registry were analyzed by investigating their compliance with the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) criteria (versions 2003 and 2013) and by error grid analyses. Regression models elucidated effects on glucose control and hypoglycemia rates. Results: Depending on the respective subgroup (defined by sex, age, duration of diabetes, mode of insulin therapy), 78.7–94.7% of the self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) values met the old and 79.7–88.6% met the new ISO criteria. In Clarke and Parkes error grid analyses, the percentages of SMBG values in Zone A ranged between 92.8% and 94.6% (Clarke) and between 92.2% and 95.0% (Parkes). The patient group with SMBG devices measuring “far too low” (compared with the laboratory-obtained glucose levels) presented with a higher HbA 1c level than those measuring “far too high,” “too high,” “identical/almost identical,” or “too low” (based on quintiles of deviation). Performing “far too high” was associated with the highest rate of hypoglycemic coma in comparison with the other deviation quintiles. Conclusions: This study showed that current SMBG devices fulfilled neither the previous nor the new ISO criteria. Large deviations of the SMBG values from the “true” glucose levels resulted in higher HbA 1c levels and markedly increased rates of hypoglycemic events.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2014.0262

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Falsely elevated blood glucose monitoring system measurement results may keep dangerous hypoglycemic metabolic states hidden or lead to inadequately large insulin doses; falsely lowered results might lead to carbohydrate consumption and long-term high blood glucose levels.

    “Furthermore, falsely elevated measurement results may keep dangerous hypoglycemic metabolic states hidden or they could lead to inadequately large insulin doses. Falsely lowered measurement results might result in the reverse scenario as a patient with diabetes might consume readily absorbable carbohydrates, and thus such measurements could lead to long-term high blood glucose levels subsequently”
  • Diabetic patients often rely on blood glucose monitoring system accuracy and use measurement results for therapeutic decisions like administration of rescue carbohydrates or insulin dosing.

    “This lack of accuracy is critical since diabetic patients often rely on BGMS accuracy and use BGMS measurement results for therapeutic decisions like administration of rescue carbohydrates or insulin dosing.25”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 34 · Cited by 35

Authors
Boettcher, C., Dost, A., Wudy, S. A., Flechtner-Mors, M., Borkenstein, M., Schiel, R., Weitzel, D., Bechtold-Dalla Pozza, S., Wolf, J., Holl, R. W., & Initiative, F. T. G. D. P. D.
Affiliations
  • Justus-Liebig-Universität Gießen (DE)
  • Jena University Hospital (DE)
  • University of Ulm
  • Medical University of Graz (AT)
  • MEDIGREIF-Inselklinik Heringsdorf
  • Deutsche Klinik für Diagnostik (DE)
  • Ludwig Maximilians University of Munich
  • St. Vincent Children's Hospital
  • Universität Ulm (DE)
Corresponding author
Boettcher, Claudia
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2015-04
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
275-282
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W1855938152
Cited by
35
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3
FWCI
3.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
  • Universität Ulm
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
Keywords
blood glucose meters, self-monitoring of blood glucose, type 1 diabetes, children and adolescents, meter accuracy, HbA1c, hypoglycemic coma, hypoglycemia, error grid analysis, glycemic control
MeSH terms
Data Accuracy, Adolescent, Austria, Child, Child, Preschool, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diabetic Coma, Female, Germany, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Infant, Male, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review