Cited by 19Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes Treatment and Management

Glycemic Variability Is Associated with Frequency of Blood Glucose Testing and Bolus: Post Hoc Analysis Results from the ProAct Study

Open access
Pfützner, Andreas, Weissmann, Jörg, Mougiakakou, Stavroula, Daskalaki, Elena, Weis, Norbert, Ziegler, Ralph·2015·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Introduction: The ProAct study has shown that a pump switch to the Accu-Chek ® Combo system (Roche Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH, Mannheim, Germany) in type 1 diabetes patients results in stable glycemic control with significant improvements in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) in patients with unsatisfactory baseline HbA1c and shorter pump usage time. Patients and Methods: In this post hoc analysis of the ProAct database, we investigated the glycemic control and glycemic variability at baseline by determination of several established parameters and scores (HbA1c, hypoglycemia frequency, J-score, Hypoglycemia and Hyperglycemia Indexes, and Index of Glycemic Control) in participants with different daily bolus and blood glucose measurement frequencies (less than four day, four or five per day, and more than five per day, in both cases). The data were derived from up to 299 patients (172 females, 127 males; age [mean±SD], 39.4±15.2 years; pump treatment duration, 7.0±5.2 years). Results: Participants with frequent glucose readings had better glycemic control than those with few readings (more than five readings per day vs. less than four readings per day: HbA1c, 7.2±1.1% vs. 8.0±0.9%; mean daily blood glucose, 151±22 mg/dL vs. 176±30 mg/dL; percentage of readings per month >300 mg/dL, 10±4% vs. 14±5%; percentage of readings in target range [80–180 mg/dL], 59% vs. 48% [ P <0.05 in all cases]) and had a lower glycemic variability (J-score, 49±13 vs. 71±25 [ P <0.05]; Hyperglycemia Index, 0.9±0.5 vs. 1.9±1.2 [ P <0.05]; Index of Glycemic Control, 1.9±0.8 vs. 3.1±1.6 [ P <0.05]; Hypoglycemia Index, 0.9±0.8 vs. 1.2±1.3 [not significant]). Frequent self-monitoring of blood glucose was associated with a higher number of bolus applications (6.1±2.2 boluses/day vs. 4.5±2.0 boluses/day [ P <0.05]). Therefore, a similar but less pronounced effect on glycemic variability in favor of more daily bolus applications was observed (more than five vs. less than four bolues per day: J-score, 57±17 vs. 63±25 [not significant]; Hypoglycemia Index, 1.0±1.0 vs. 1.5±1.4 [ P <0.05]; Hyperglycemia Index, 1.3±0.6 vs. 1.6±1.1 [not significant]; Index of Glycemic Control, 2.3±1.1 vs. 3.1±1.7 [ P <0.05]). Conclusions: Pump users who perform frequent daily glucose readings have a better glycemic control with lower glycemic variability.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2014.0278

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 19 · Cited by 19

Authors
Pfützner, A., Weissmann, J., Mougiakakou, S., Daskalaki, E., Weis, N., & Ziegler, R.
Affiliations
  • Diabetes Center and Practice
  • Roche Diagnostics Deutschland GmbH
  • University of Bern (CH)
  • Diabetes Clinic for Children and Adolescents
Corresponding author
Pfützner, Andreas
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2015-06
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
392-397
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W2323046773
Cited by
19
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2
FWCI
2.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • BORIS (University Library Bern) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
Keywords
glycemic variability, type 1 diabetes, continuous glucose monitoring, glycemic control, HbA1c, hypoglycemia, glycemic variability index
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemia, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Time Factors, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review