Ethnic-Specific Criteria for Classification of Body Mass Index: A Perspective for Asian Indians and American Diabetes Association Position Statement
Open accessAbstract
Definitions for overweight and obesity are universally applied using body mass index (BMI), based on morbidity and mortality data derived from white populations. However, several studies have shown higher body fat, excess metabolic perturbations, and cardiovascular risk factors at lower value of BMI in Asian versus white populations. Definitive guidelines have been published to classify a BMI of ≥23 kg/m(2) and ≥25 kg/m(2) as overweight and obese, respectively, by the Indian Consensus Group (for Asian Indians residing in India) and a BMI of ≥23 kg/m(2) for screening for diabetes by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence of the United Kingdom (for migrant south Asians) and, in an encouraging initiative recently (2015), by the American Diabetes Association (for all Asian ethnic groups in the United States). Overall, multiple studies, and now several guidelines, emphasize early intervention with diet and physical activity in Asian ethnic groups for prevention and management of obesity-related noncommunicable diseases. By application of these guidelines, an additional 10-15% of the population in India would be labeled as overweight/obese, and more South Asians/Asians will be diagnosed with diabetes in the United Kingdom and the United States. Additional health resources need to be allocated to deal with increasing numbers of Asians with obesity-related noncommunicable diseases, and research is needed to evolve cost-effective interventions. Finally, consensus based on data is needed so that the World Health Organization and other international agencies could take definitive steps for revision of classification of BMI for Asian populations globally.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the Asian population, the prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease is higher at a lower BMI than in the non-Asian population.
“In the Asian population the prevalence of diabetes and cardiovascular disease is higher at a lower BMI than in the non-Asian population.”
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 40 · Cited by 292
- Authors
- Misra, A.
- Affiliations
- National Diabetes Obesity and Cholesterol Foundation (IN)
- Corresponding author
- Misra, Anoop
- ORCID
- Misra, Anoop
- Venue
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 667-671
- ISSN
- 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-8593
- PMC
- PMC4555479
- OpenAlex
- W1853996761
- Cited by
- 292
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 32 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5
- FWCI
- 9.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
- Keywords
- body mass index, obesity classification, Asian Indians, South Asians, overweight, diabetes screening, non-communicable diseases, obesity prevention, physical activity, diet, healthcare resource allocation
- MeSH terms
- Adipose Tissue, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, United Kingdom, Humans, India, Risk Factors, Societies, Medical, United States, Body Mass Index, Practice Guidelines as Topic, White People, Asian People, Overweight
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review