Cited by 292Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsObesity, Physical Activity, DietBody Composition Measurement Techniques

Ethnic-Specific Criteria for Classification of Body Mass Index: A Perspective for Asian Indians and American Diabetes Association Position Statement

Open access
Misra, Anoop·2015·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Definitions for overweight and obesity are universally applied using body mass index (BMI), based on morbidity and mortality data derived from white populations. However, several studies have shown higher body fat, excess metabolic perturbations, and cardiovascular risk factors at lower value of BMI in Asian versus white populations. Definitive guidelines have been published to classify a BMI of ≥23 kg/m(2) and ≥25 kg/m(2) as overweight and obese, respectively, by the Indian Consensus Group (for Asian Indians residing in India) and a BMI of ≥23 kg/m(2) for screening for diabetes by the National Institute of Health and Care Excellence of the United Kingdom (for migrant south Asians) and, in an encouraging initiative recently (2015), by the American Diabetes Association (for all Asian ethnic groups in the United States). Overall, multiple studies, and now several guidelines, emphasize early intervention with diet and physical activity in Asian ethnic groups for prevention and management of obesity-related noncommunicable diseases. By application of these guidelines, an additional 10-15% of the population in India would be labeled as overweight/obese, and more South Asians/Asians will be diagnosed with diabetes in the United Kingdom and the United States. Additional health resources need to be allocated to deal with increasing numbers of Asians with obesity-related noncommunicable diseases, and research is needed to evolve cost-effective interventions. Finally, consensus based on data is needed so that the World Health Organization and other international agencies could take definitive steps for revision of classification of BMI for Asian populations globally.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2015.0007

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 40 · Cited by 292

Authors
Misra, A.
Affiliations
National Diabetes Obesity and Cholesterol Foundation (IN)
Corresponding author
Misra, Anoop
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2015-09
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
667-671
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W1853996761
Cited by
292
References
40
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5
FWCI
9.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
Keywords
body mass index, obesity classification, Asian Indians, South Asians, overweight, diabetes screening, non-communicable diseases, obesity prevention, physical activity, diet, healthcare resource allocation
MeSH terms
Adipose Tissue, Cardiovascular Diseases, Diabetes Mellitus, United Kingdom, Humans, India, Risk Factors, Societies, Medical, United States, Body Mass Index, Practice Guidelines as Topic, White People, Asian People, Overweight

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review