Cited by 46Diabetes Management and ResearchClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlHyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients

System Accuracy Evaluation of Different Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Following ISO 15197:2013 by Using Two Different Comparison Methods

Freckmann, Guido, Link, Manuela, Schmid, Christina, Pleus, Stefan, Baumstark, Annette, Haug, Cornelia·2015·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Adherence to established standards (e.g., International Organization for Standardization [ISO] 15197) is important to ensure comparable and sufficient accuracy of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG). Accuracy evaluation was performed for different SMBG systems available in Europe with three reagent lots each. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Test procedures followed the recently published revision ISO 15197:2013. Comparison measurements were performed with a glucose oxidase (YSI 2300 STAT Plus™ glucose analyzer; YSI Inc., Yellow Springs, OH) and a hexokinase (cobas Integra(®) 400 Plus analyzer; Roche Instrument Center, Rotkreuz, Switzerland) method. Compliance with ISO 15197:2013 accuracy criteria was determined by calculating the percentage of results within ±15% or within ±0.83 mmol/L of the comparison measurement results for glucose concentrations at and above or below 5.55 mmol/L, respectively, and by calculating the percentage of results within consensus error grid Zones A and B. RESULTS: Seven systems showed with all three tested lots that 95-100% of the results were within the accuracy limits of ISO 15197:2013 and that 100% of results were within consensus error grid Zones A and B, irrespective of the comparison method used. Regarding results of individual lots, slight differences between the glucose oxidase method and the hexokinase method were found. Accuracy criteria of ISO 15197:2003 (±20% for concentrations ≥4.2 mmol/L and±0.83 mmol/L for concentrations <4.2 mmol/L) were fulfilled by eight systems with all three lots and by one system with two lots. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, seven systems complied with the accuracy criteria of ISO 15197:2013. The results also indicate that the comparison measurement method/system is important, as it may have a considerable impact on accuracy data obtained for a system.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2015.0085

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • At present, there is no harmonization of reference measurement procedures for evaluating blood glucose monitoring system accuracy, and current systems are typically calibrated against either a glucose oxidase-based or a hexokinase-based reference measurement procedure.

    “However, at present, there is no harmonization of reference measurement procedures for evaluating BGMS accuracy and current BGMS are typically calibrated against either a glucose oxidase (GOD)–based or a hexokinase (HK)-based reference measurement procedure.15”
  • In a study by Freckmann et al with three tested reagent system lots per blood glucose monitoring system in 2015, 33% (3 out of 9) systems did not meet ISO 15197 accuracy requirements.

    “In a study by Freckmann et al 15 with three tested reagent system lots per BGMS in 2015, 33% (3 out of 9) BGMS did not meet ISO 15197 accuracy requirements.”

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 18 · Cited by 46

Authors
Freckmann, G., Link, M., Schmid, C., Pleus, S., Baumstark, A., & Haug, C.
Affiliations
Institut für Diabetes-Technologie (Germany) (DE)
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2015-09
Volume
17
Issue
9
Pages
635-648
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W2163682729
Cited by
46
References
18
Citations by year
2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1
FWCI
6.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Sanofi
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hyperglycemia and glycemic control in critically ill and hospitalized patients
Keywords
self-monitoring of blood glucose, blood glucose meters, ISO 15197:2013, accuracy assessment, glucose oxidase method, hexokinase method, diabetes management
MeSH terms
Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Glucose Oxidase, Hexokinase, Humans, Reagent Strips, Reference Standards, Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review