Cited by 18Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDiabetes and associated disorders

Treatment Modality–Dependent Risk of Diabetic Ketoacidosis in Patients with Type 1 Diabetes: Danish Adult Diabetes Database Study

Hoshina, Sari, Andersen, Gregers S., Jørgensen, Marit E., Ridderstråle, Martin, Vistisen, Dorte, Andersen, Henrik U.·2018·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background and aims The aim of this study was to evaluate the incidence rates of diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) according to treatment modality in patients with type 1 diabetes (T1D) in Denmark, either multiple daily injections (MDI) or continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII). Materials and methods A total of 20,902 T1D registered in the Danish Adult Diabetes Database were followed for an average of 5.4 years. Poisson regression analyses with risk time as offset were used to compare differences in rates of DKA between CSII and MDI. Model was adjusted for age, sex, diabetes duration, previous DKA events, and hemoglobin A 1 c (HbA 1 c ). A modifying effect of number of CSII patients on the DKA rates was tested. Results During 113,731 person-years, 3100 DKA events were registered (53 among CSII). CSII patients were younger (42.3 vs. 47.9 years), a larger proportion was female (59% vs. 43%), had a shorter diabetes duration (19 vs. 21 years), and a lower HbA 1c (61.9 vs. 66.6 mmol/mol). There was no significant difference in the incidence rate of DKA between CSII and MDI (rate ratio: 1.30, 95% confidence interval: 0.97-1.76). However, in clinics with at least 250 CSII patients, rates of DKA events were lower among CSII users, while the opposite was true for the smaller clinics (P = 0.016). Conclusions Delivery of CSII in large diabetes clinics with sufficient support and patient education may ensure that CSII treatment does not lead to an increased risk of DKA.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2017.0231

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hoshina, S., Andersen, G. S., Jørgensen, M. E., Ridderstråle, M., Vistisen, D., & Andersen, H. U.
Affiliations
  • Tokyo Women's Medical University (JP)
  • Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (DK)
  • University of Southern Denmark (DK)
  • Novo Nordisk (Denmark) (DK)
Corresponding author
Hoshina, Sari
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2018-03
Volume
20
Issue
3
Pages
229-234
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W2788522957
Cited by
18
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Steno Diabetes Center Copenhagen (SDCC 3.D Type1 Biology)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
diabetic ketoacidosis, type 1 diabetes, insulin pump therapy, multiple daily insulin injections, patient education, glycemic control
MeSH terms
Adult, Blood Glucose, Denmark, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Female, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Injections, Subcutaneous, Insulin, Insulin Infusion Systems, Male, Middle Aged, Risk, Incidence, Databases, Factual, Diabetic Ketoacidosis, Infusions, Subcutaneous

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review