Cited by 20Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Treatment and ManagementDiabetes and associated disorders

Effects of Sotagliflozin Combined with Intensive Insulin Therapy in Young Adults with Poorly Controlled Type 1 Diabetes: The JDRF Sotagliflozin Study

Open access
Bode, Bruce W., Cengiz, Eda, Wadwa, R. Paul, Banks, Phillip, Danne, Thomas, Kushner, Jake A., McGuire, Darren K., Peters, Anne L. +2 more·2021·Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics

Abstract

Background: Young adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) tend to have higher A1C than older adults and are at increased risk for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Oral adjuncts to insulin have not been previously studied in this population. Methods: In this phase 2, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study, adults aged 18–30 years with T1D and A1C ≥9.0% were randomly assigned to placebo ( n = 42) or sotagliflozin 400 mg ( n = 43), in addition to insulin for 12 weeks. Insulin doses were adjusted to meet glucose targets (preprandial 80–130 mg/dL, postprandial <180 mg/dL). The primary endpoint was change from baseline in A1C at week 12. Results: From a baseline of 9.8%, mean A1C decreased by 1.0% with placebo and 1.3% with sotagliflozin (−0.4% [95% confidence interval (CI): −0.8 to 0.1]; P = 0.10 vs. placebo). In the prespecified A1C ≤10.0% subgroup, the treatment difference was −0.8% (−1.3 to −0.2; P = 0.006), favoring sotagliflozin. Overall, relative to placebo, postprandial glucose (PPG) decreased by 56.6 mg/dL (−89.7 to −23.6; P < 0.001) and weight decreased by 2.37 kg (−3.5 to −1.2; P < 0.001). More patients achieved an A1C <7.0% with sotagliflozin (16.3%) than placebo (2.4%; P = 0.026). Rates of documented hypoglycemia and severe hypoglycemia were similar between groups. One DKA event occurred with placebo, and none occurred with sotagliflozin. Conclusions: In young adults with T1D and suboptimal glycemic control, sotagliflozin plus insulin for 12 weeks numerically improved A1C and significantly improved A1C goal attainment, PPG, and body weight. Sotagliflozin plus insulin was generally well tolerated without any episodes of DKA (NCT02383940).

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/dia.2020.0079

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In adults aged 18-30 years with suboptimal glycaemic control, sotagliflozin plus insulin for 12 weeks improved HbA1c, postprandial blood sugar, goal attainment, and bodyweight.

    “In adults aged 18-30 years with suboptimal glycaemic control, sotagliflozin plus insulin for 12 weeks improved HbA₁ c , postprandial blood sugar, goal attainment, and bodyweight.97”

    From The future of type 1 diabetes therapy (2025) · cites this paper as [97]

    The Abstract describes adults aged 18–30 treated for 12 weeks and reports improved postprandial glucose, A1C goal attainment, and body weight. It describes the overall A1C improvement as numerical: the difference from placebo was not statistically significant (P = 0.10). The Discussion likewise limits its conclusion to a numerical A1C reduction, so the unqualified HbA1c claim overstates that result. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 23 · Cited by 20

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [1]1. Foster NC, Beck RW, Miller KM, et al.: State of type 1 diabetes management and outcomes from the T1D exchange in 2016-2018. Diabetes Technol Ther 2019;21:66-72.
  2. [3]3. Thomas AM, Peterson L, Goldstein D: Problem solving and diabetes regimen adherence by children and adolescents with IDDM in social pressure situations: a reflection of normal development. J Pediatr Psychol 1997;22:541-561.
  3. [4]4. Yi-Frazier JP, Yaptangco M, Semana S, et al.: The association of personal resilience with stress, coping, and diabetes outcomes in adolescents with type 1 diabetes: variable- and person-focused approaches. J Health Psychol 2015;20:1196-1206.
  4. [5]5. Bode BW, Garg SK: The emerging role of adjunctive noninsulin antihyperglycemic therapy in the management of type 1 diabetes. Endocr Pract 2016;22:220-230.
  5. [6]6. Lyons SK, Hermann JM, Miller KM, et al.: Use of adjuvant pharmacotherapy in type 1 diabetes: international comparison of 49,996 individuals in the Prospective Diabetes Follow-up and T1D Exchange Registries. Diabetes Care 2017;40:e139-e140.
  6. [8]8. Garg SK, Henry RR, Banks P, et al.: Effects of sotagliflozin added to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2017;377:2337-2348.
  7. [10]10. Danne T, Cariou B, Banks P, et al.: HbA1c and hypoglycemia reduction at 24 and 52 weeks with sotagliflozin in combination with insulin in adults with type 1 diabetes: the European inTandem2 study. Diabetes Care 2018;41:19811990.
  8. [11]11. Dandona P, Mathieu C, Phillip M, et al.: Efficacy and safety of dapagliflozin in patients with inadequately controlled type 1 diabetes (DEPICT-1): 24 week results from a multicentre, double-blind, phase 3, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;5:864-876.
  9. [13]13. Rosenstock J, Marquard J, Laffel LM, et al.: Empagliflozin as adjunctive to insulin therapy in type 1 diabetes: the EASE trials. Diabetes Care 2018;41:2560-2569.
  10. [14]14. Sands AT, Zambrowicz BP, Rosenstock J, et al.: Sotagliflozin, a dual SGLT1 and SGLT2 inhibitor, as adjunct therapy to insulin in type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015; 38:1181-1188.
  11. [15]15. Baker C, Wason S, Banks P, et al.: Dose-dependent glycometabolic effects of sotagliflozin on type 1 diabetes over 12 weeks: The inTandem4 trial. Diabetes Obes Metab 2019; 21:2440-2449.
  12. [16]16. Henry RR, Thakkar P, Tong C, et al.: Efficacy and safety of canagliflozin, a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, as - add-on to insulin in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2015;38:2258-2265.
  13. [17]17. Khan A, Fahl Mar K, Schilling J, Brown WA: Magnitude and pattern of placebo response in clinical trials of oral antihyperglycemic agents: data from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 1999-2015. Diabetes Care 2018;41: 994-1000.
  14. [18]18. Henry RR, Rosenstock J, Edelman S, et al.: Exploring the potential of the SGLT2 inhibitor dapagliflozin in type 1 diabetes: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pilot study. Diabetes Care 2015;38:412-419.
  15. [19]19. Peters AL, Buschur EO, Buse JB, et al.: Euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis: a potential complication of treatment with sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibition. Diabetes Care 2015;38:1687-1693.
  16. [20]20. Garg SK, Strumph P: Effects of sotagliflozin added to insulin in type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2018;378:967-968.
  17. [21]21. Danne T, Garg S, Peters AL, et al.: International consensus on risk management of diabetic ketoacidosis in patients - with type 1 diabetes treated with sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT) inhibitors. Diabetes Care 2019; DOI: 10.2337/dc18-2316. · DOI · Paper page
  18. [22]22. Garg SK, Peters AL, Buse JB, Danne T: Strategy for Mitigating DKA risk in patients with type 1 diabetes on adjunctive treatment with SGLT inhibitors: a STICH protocol. Diabetes Technol Ther 2018;20:571-575.

Authors
Bode, B. W., Cengiz, E., Wadwa, R. P., Banks, P., Danne, T., Kushner, J. A., McGuire, D. K., Peters, A. L., Strumph, P., & Sawhney, S.
Affiliations
  • Atlanta Diabetes Associates (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
  • Lexicon Pharmaceuticals (United States) (US)
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (DE)
  • McNair Interests and McNair Medical Institute, Houston, Texas, USA.
  • The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center (US)
  • University of Southern California (US)
Corresponding author
Bode, Bruce W.
Venue
Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics
Published
2020-12-31
Volume
23
Issue
1
Pages
59-69
ISSN
  • 1520-9156 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-8593
OpenAlex
W3041218630
Cited by
20
References
23
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (UL1TR001863)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (P30DK045735)
  • National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Diabetes and associated disorders
Keywords
sotagliflozin, type 1 diabetes, young adults, intensive insulin therapy, glycemic control, HbA1c, postprandial blood glucose, SGLT2 inhibitors, diabetic ketoacidosis, hypoglycemia, weight loss, oral glucose-lowering agents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Blood Glucose, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Double-Blind Method, Drug Therapy, Combination, Female, Glycosides, Glycated Hemoglobin, Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Insulin, Male, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review