The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of Particle Size and Crystalline Phase on Lead Adsorption to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles
Abstract
The adsorption of lead to TiO2 materials with different particle sizes and compositions was investigated to examine the factors controlling metal adsorption to nanoparticles. Experiments were conducted with four different TiO2 materials. Three of the materials were nanoparticles, with sizes ranging from 20 to 33 nm, and the fourth was a bulk material with a 520-nm particle size. Batch adsorption experiments were conducted over a broad range of pH (2–8) and total lead concentration (10−8–10−4 M) to provide a comprehensive dataset for modeling equilibrium adsorption. Modeling was conducted using both the Langmuir isotherm model and a surface complexation model. Adsorption capacity was most effectively evaluated using the Langmuir model, and adsorption affinity was assessed best through surface complexation modeling. On a mass basis, the adsorption capacity to the nanoparticles was always higher than to the bulk material. However, when adsorption capacity was normalized to surface area, the bulk material had a higher capacity. Among the nanoparticles, the capacity was higher for a material that was pure anatase than for the two materials that were predominantly anatase with additional amounts of rutile. Surface complexation modeling determined a similar trend for adsorption affinity. Adsorption was strongest to the bulk material, followed by the pure anatase nanoparticles, and then the mixed anatase–rutile nanoparticles. For each of the materials, a surface complexation model with only one adjustable parameter provided good fits to the experimental data.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Heavy metal removal from water/wastewater by nanosized metal oxides: A review
Hua, M., Zhang, S., Pan, B., Zhang, W., Lv, L., & Zhang, Q. (2012) · Journal of Hazardous Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2011.10.016 · Cited by 2,193
Environmental behavior and ecotoxicity of engineered nanoparticles to algae, plants, and fungi
Navarro, E., Baun, A., Behra, R., Hartmann, N. B., Filser, J., Miao, A.-J., Quigg, A., Santschi, P. H., & Sigg, L. (2008) · Ecotoxicology · doi:10.1007/s10646-008-0214-0 · Cited by 1,772
French, R. A., Jacobson, A. R., Kim, B., Isley, S. L., Penn, R. L., & Baveye, P. C. (2009) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es802628n · Cited by 788
Nanoadsorbents: Classification, Preparation, and Applications (with Emphasis on Aqueous Media)
Khajeh, M., Laurent, S., & Dastafkan, K. (2013) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400086v · Cited by 528
Use of CeO2, TiO2 and Fe3O4 nanoparticles for the removal of lead from water
Recillas, S., García, A., González, E., Casals, E., Puntes, V., Sánchez, A., & Font, X. (2011) · Desalination · doi:10.1016/j.desal.2011.04.036 · Cited by 142
Metadata
- Authors
- Giammar, D. E., Maus, C. J., & Xie, L.
- Venue
- Environmental Engineering Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 85-95
- ISSN
- 1092-8758 (ISSN-L)
- 1557-9018
- OpenAlex
- W2024291894
- Cited by
- 170
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Particle Size and Crystalline Phase on Lead Adsorption to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ees.2007.24.85
- The paper
- Giammar, D. E., Maus, C. J., & Xie, L. (2007). Effects of Particle Size and Crystalline Phase on Lead Adsorption to Titanium Dioxide Nanoparticles. Environmental Engineering Science. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2007.24.85
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.