Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 294

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Stability of Nanobubbles

Meegoda, Jay N., Aluthgun Hewage, Shaini, Batagoda, Janitha H.·2018·Environmental Engineering Science

Abstract

Abstract With stable existence in liquids for over several weeks, nanobubbles have an extensive range of applications across many fields of science and engineering. For an effective and functional use of these bubbles, it is important to know the reason for their long-term stability. Therefore, a comprehensive laboratory investigation was performed to determine bubble size distributions and zeta potentials of nanobubbles, first with four different gases (test series I), then with different salt concentrations, pH levels, and temperatures of the solution (test series II). Experimental results from test series I showed that the average bubble size depended on the gas solubility in water, and zeta potential depended on the ability of the gas to generate OH − ions at the water/gas interface. Experimental results from test series II showed that bubbles with high negative zeta potentials can be generated in solutions of high pH, low temperatures, and low salt concentrations. The high pH solutions produced smaller but stable nanobubbles. Bubble diameter slightly increased with increasing salt concentration. However, bubble size did not show considerable dependence on solution temperature. Long-term tests showed that with time zeta potential of bubbles decreased while the bubble size increased. Even though bubble sizes are expected to decrease with time due to gas diffusion, results indicate increased bubble sizes. This is because of decrease in zeta potential and bubble movement due to Brownian motion which causes bubble coalescence over time to form larger bubbles.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/ees.2018.0203

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.054 · doi:10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.05.054
  2. Bauer W.J. (2014). Nanobubble-containing liquid solutions. US patent application 15/025,971. October, 3, 2014.
  3. 10.1016/j.mineng.2014.02.002 · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2014.02.002
  4. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.063 · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2005.06.063
  5. 10.1016/j.homp.2015.02.001 · doi:10.1016/j.homp.2015.02.001
  6. Eagleton J. (1999). Ozone in drinking water treatment. DRAFT—JGE. 2, 1.
  7. 10.1088/1742-6596/147/1/012024 · doi:10.1088/1742-6596/147/1/012024
  8. 10.1039/c0em00594k · doi:10.1039/c0em00594k
  9. 10.1061/(ASCE)EE.1943-7870.0000877 · doi:10.1061/(asce)ee.1943-7870.0000877
  10. 10.1021/es903853v · doi:10.1021/es903853v
  11. 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.030 · doi:10.1016/j.jhazmat.2017.08.030
  12. 10.1016/S1452-3981(23)14725-0 · doi:10.1016/s1452-3981(23)14725-0
  13. 10.1006/jcis.1999.6663 · doi:10.1006/jcis.1999.6663
  14. 10.1051/jphyscol:1979847 · doi:10.1051/jphyscol:1979847
  15. 10.3390/ijerph110100473 · doi:10.3390/ijerph110100473
  16. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01368 · doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.5b01368
  17. 10.1016/S1674-5264(09)60154-X · doi:10.1016/s1674-5264(09)60154-x
  18. 10.1061/9780784480168.039 · doi:10.1061/9780784480168.039
  19. 10.1680/jenes.17.00006 · doi:10.1680/jenes.17.00006
  20. 10.1016/j.ces.2009.10.003 · doi:10.1016/j.ces.2009.10.003
  21. 10.1016/j.mineng.2017.10.020 · doi:10.1016/j.mineng.2017.10.020
  22. 10.1063/1.4904718 · doi:10.1063/1.4904718
  23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.214501 · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.214501
  24. 10.1016/j.cis.2017.06.011 · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2017.06.011
  25. 10.1201/b17278 · doi:10.1201/b17278
  26. 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.03.005 · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfa.2010.03.005
  27. 10.1007/978-1-60327-133-2_2 · doi:10.1007/978-1-60327-133-2_2

Cited by

See all 294

Metadata

Authors
Meegoda, J. N., Aluthgun Hewage, S., & Batagoda, J. H.
Venue
Environmental Engineering Science
Published
2018-11
Volume
35
Issue
11
Pages
1216-1227
ISSN
  • 1092-8758 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-9018
OpenAlex
W2892851850
Cited by
294
References
6
FWCI
6.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Stability of Nanobubbles. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/ees.2018.0203
The paper
Meegoda, J. N., Aluthgun Hewage, S., & Batagoda, J. H. (2018). Stability of Nanobubbles. Environmental Engineering Science. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2018.0203

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.