Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 165

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Development and Validation of a PulseNet Standardized Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Protocol for Subtyping of Vibrio cholerae

Cooper, K.L.F., Luey, C.K.Y., Bird, M., Terajima, J., Nair, G.B., Kam, K.M., Arakawa, E., Safa, A., Cheung, D.T., Law, C.P., Watanabe, H., Kubota, K., Swaminathan, B., Ribot, E.M.·2006·Foodborne Pathogens and Disease

Abstract

PulseNet is a network that utilizes standardized pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) protocols with the purpose of conducting laboratory-based surveillance of foodborne pathogens. PulseNet standardized PFGE protocols are subject to rigorous testing during the developmental phase and careful evaluation during a validation process assessing its robustness and reproducibility in different laboratories. Here we describe the development and validation of a rapid PFGE protocol for subtyping Vibrio cholerae for use in PulseNet International activities. While the protocol was derived from the existing PulseNet protocol for Escherichia coli O157, various aspects of this protocol were optimized for use with V. cholerae, most notably a change of the primary and secondary restriction enzyme to SfiI and NotI, respectively, and the use of a two-block electrophoresis program. External validation of this protocol was undertaken through a collaboration between three PulseNet Asia Pacific laboratories (Public Health Laboratory Centre, Hong Kong, National Institute of Infectious Diseases, Japan, and International Center for Diarrhoeal Diseases Research-Bangladesh) and PulseNet USA. Comparison of PFGE patterns generated by each of the participating laboratories demonstrated that the protocol is robust and reproducible.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/fpd.2006.3.51

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 165

Metadata

Authors
Cooper, K. L. F., Luey, C. K. Y., Bird, M., Terajima, J., Nair, G. B., Kam, K. M., Arakawa, E., Safa, A., Cheung, D. T., Law, C. P., Watanabe, H., Kubota, K., Swaminathan, B., & Ribot, E. M.
Venue
Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
Published
2006-03
Volume
3
Issue
1
Pages
51-58
ISSN
  • 1535-3141 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-7125
OpenAlex
W1996481076
Cited by
165
References
0
FWCI
6.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development and Validation of a PulseNet Standardized Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Protocol for Subtyping of Vibrio cholerae. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/fpd.2006.3.51
The paper
Cooper, K. L. F., Luey, C. K. Y., Bird, M., Terajima, J., Nair, G. B., Kam, K. M., Arakawa, E., Safa, A., Cheung, D. T., Law, C. P., Watanabe, H., Kubota, K., Swaminathan, B., & Ribot, E. M. (2006). Development and Validation of a PulseNet Standardized Pulsed-Field Gel Electrophoresis Protocol for Subtyping of Vibrio cholerae. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2006.3.51

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.