The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Food Safety Hazards Associated with Consumption of Raw Milk
Abstract
An increasing number of people are consuming raw unpasteurized milk. Enhanced nutritional qualities, taste, and health benefits have all been advocated as reasons for increased interest in raw milk consumption. However, science-based data to substantiate these claims are limited. People continue to consume raw milk even though numerous epidemiological studies have shown clearly that raw milk can be contaminated by a variety of pathogens, some of which are associated with human illness and disease. Several documented milkborne disease outbreaks occurred from 2000-2008 and were traced back to consumption of raw unpasteurized milk. Numerous people were found to have infections, some were hospitalized, and a few died. In the majority of these outbreaks, the organism associated with the milkborne outbreak was isolated from the implicated product(s) or from subsequent products made at the suspected dairy or source. In contrast, fewer milkborne disease outbreaks were associated with consumption of pasteurized milk during this same time period. Twenty nine states allow the sale of raw milk by some means. Direct purchase, cow-share or leasing programs, and the sale of raw milk as pet food have been used as means for consumers to obtain raw milk. Where raw milk is offered for sale, strategies to reduce risks associated with raw milk and products made from raw milk are needed. Developing uniform regulations including microbial standards for raw milk to be sold for human consumption, labeling of raw milk, improving sanitation during milking, and enhancing and targeting educational efforts are potential approaches to this issue. Development of pre- and postharvest control measures to effectively reduce contamination is critical to the control of pathogens in raw milk. One sure way to prevent raw milk-associated foodborne illness is for consumers to refrain from drinking raw milk and from consuming dairy products manufactured using raw milk.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Complex Microbiota of Raw Milk
Quigley, L., O'Sullivan, O., Stanton, C., Beresford, T. P., Ross, R. P., Fitzgerald, G. F., & Cotter, P. D. (2013) · FEMS Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1111/1574-6976.12030 · Cited by 919
Reservoirs of antimicrobial resistance genes in retail raw milk
Liu, J., Zhu, Y., Jay-Russell, M., Lemay, D. G., & Mills, D. A. (2020) · Microbiome · doi:10.1186/s40168-020-00861-6 · Cited by 99
Milk handling practices and consumption behavior among Borana pastoralists in southern Ethiopia
Amenu, K., Wieland, B., Szonyi, B., & Grace, D. (2019) · Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition · doi:10.1186/s41043-019-0163-7 · Cited by 92
Hou, Q., Xu, H., Zheng, Y., Xi, X., Kwok, L.-Y., Sun, Z., Zhang, H., & Zhang, W. (2015) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2015-9886 · Cited by 83
Tolosa, T., Verbeke, J., Piepers, S., Tefera, M., Getachew, Y., Supré, K., & DeVliegher, S. (2016) · Preventive Veterinary Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.12.016 · Cited by 30
Metadata
- Authors
- Oliver, S. P., Boor, K. J., Murphy, S. C., & Murinda, S. E.
- Venue
- Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-09
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 793-806
- ISSN
- 1535-3141 (ISSN-L)
- 1556-7125
- OpenAlex
- W1973032822
- Cited by
- 417
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 33.50
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Food Safety Hazards Associated with Consumption of Raw Milk. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1089/fpd.2009.0302
- The paper
- Oliver, S. P., Boor, K. J., Murphy, S. C., & Murinda, S. E. (2009). Food Safety Hazards Associated with Consumption of Raw Milk. Foodborne Pathogens and Disease. https://doi.org/10.1089/fpd.2009.0302
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.