Cited by 28Antibiotic Resistance in BacteriaSalmonella and Campylobacter epidemiologyAntibiotic Use and Resistance

Prevalence and Characterization of Multidrug-Resistant Zoonotic Enterobacter spp. in Poultry of Bangladesh

Nandi, Shuvro Prokash, Sultana, Munawar, Hossain, M. Anwar·2013·Foodborne Pathogens and Disease

Abstract

Poultry and poultry products are major contributors of zoonotic pathogens. Limited data are available on Enterobacter spp. as a potent zoonotic pathogen in poultry. The present study is a first endeavor on the emergence of multidrug-resistant zoonotic Enterobacter spp. and its prevalence arising from poultry in Bangladesh. Cloacal swabs from poultry samples of five different farms at Savar, Dhaka, Bangladesh were collected and from 106 isolates, 18 presumptive Enterobacter spp. were obtained. Antibiogram using 19 used antibiotics belonging to 15 major groups revealed that all of the 18 isolates were completely resistant to penicillin and rifampicin, but differed in their drug resistance pattern against ampicillin (94.4%), clindamycin (94.4%), erythromycin (94.4%), vancomycin (88.9%), sulfonamides (72.2%), imipenem (66.6%), streptomycin (55.6%), nitrofurantoin (33.3%), doxycycline (33.3%), tetracyclines (33.3%), cefepime (11.1%), and gentamicin (5.6%). All Enterobacter spp. were found to be plasmid free, implying that multidrug-resistant properties are chromosomal borne. The vanA and sulI were detected by polymerase chain reaction assay in 17 and 13 isolates, respectively. Amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis and randomly amplified polymorphic DNA distributed the 18 multidrug-resistant Enterobacter spp. into three genotypes. Phylogenetic analysis of the representatives of the three genotypes using partial 16S rRNA gene sequence (approximately 900 bp) showed that the ge…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1089/fpd.2012.1388

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nandi, S. P., Sultana, M., & Hossain, M. A.
Affiliations
University of Dhaka (BD)
Venue
Foodborne Pathogens and Disease
Published
2013-05
Volume
10
Issue
5
Pages
420-427
ISSN
  • 1535-3141 (ISSN-L)
  • 1556-7125
OpenAlex
W1984690356
Cited by
28
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2014: 3
FWCI
0.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Foodborne Pathogens and Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Dhaka
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Medicine › Antibiotic Resistance in Bacteria
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Salmonella and Campylobacter epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology › Antibiotic Use and Resistance
Keywords
multidrug resistance, poultry, antimicrobial resistance, Enterobacter hormaechei, Enterobacter cloacae, Enterobacter cancerogenus, vanA gene, sulI, chromosomal resistance, 16S rRNA phylogeny, antibiotic use in poultry, Bangladesh
MeSH terms
Animals, Anti-Bacterial Agents, Bangladesh, Base Sequence, Chromosomes, Bacterial, DNA, Bacterial, DNA, Ribosomal, Enterobacter, Enterobacteriaceae Infections, Genotype, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Molecular Sequence Data, Phylogeny, Poultry, Poultry Diseases, RNA, Ribosomal, 16S, Zoonoses, Prevalence, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Random Amplified Polymorphic DNA Technique, Drug Resistance, Multiple, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review